Comparison of Bare Metal vs Covered Proximal Stent Fixation During Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
FEVAR for CAAAs and Extent IV TAAAs was performed with high technical success, low mortality, and MAEs, independent of the use of BMFS. There is no difference in patient survival and freedom from secondary interventions in patients treated with or without BMFS.Clinical ImpactOne hundred forty-seven patients were treated with bare-metal fixation-stent (79) or covered fixation stents (68). Technical success was similar (p=.47). Overall 30-day mortality was 1%, with no difference in major adverse events (MAEs; p=.59). At 1- and 3-year, there was no difference in patient survival (p=.51), freedom from secondary intervention (p=.71). In conclusion, FEVAR for CAAAs and Extent IV TAAAs was performed with high technical success, low mortality and MAEs, independent of the use of bare-metal fixation stent.
Authors
- Lucas Ruiter Kanamori (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4644-1560)
- Bernardo C. Mendes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-0681)
- Steven Maximus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-1681)
- Gustavo S. Oderich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-7514)
- Bruno Schmid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-504X)
- Naveed Saqib
- Emanuel R. Tenorio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9128-6256)
- Thanila A. Macedo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3556-1556)
- Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa Lima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-2029)
- Ying Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5450-3816)
Institutions
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251388749
- Primary Topic
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00