Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Ecological Restoration Programs Across China’s Desert and Desertification-Prone Regions by Integrating Vegetation Dynamics and Investment Data

The fragile ecosystem of desert and desertification-prone regions (D & DPRs) in China is highly sensitive to climate change, landuse intensification, and human interventions such as deforestation and overgrazing. In response, large-scale ecological restoration programs have been implemented over the past decades, yet their effect and cost-effectiveness remain insufficiently understood. Here, by applying multi-source remote sensing data, employing the Geodetector model, and developing a Return on Investment (RI) index, we established a framework to quantify the ecological restoration effect and assess the cost-effectiveness of the ecological restoration programs launched in China’s D & DPRs. The results indicated that a marked shift in ecosystem dynamics occurred in 1999. A comparison of the pre-restoration (1982–1998) and post-restoration (1999–2020) periods revealed that the restoration and degradation occur simultaneously, with the proportions increasing by 15.5% and 21%, respectively. Spatially, the identified ecological restoration effect was concentrated in the northern Loess Plateau, the northeastern Inner Mongolia Plateau, and the Hexi Corridor, which were strongly linked to population, land management strategies and infrastructural accessibility. However, the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that higher levels of ecological investment did not necessarily lead to greater ecological restoration effect. Instead, restoration efficiency varied substantially across different ecological and socio-economic contexts. These findings suggest that ecological restoration in China’s D & DPRs is not a uniform process but is contingent on social-ecological characteristics and investment strategies. Our results emphasize the need for adaptive, region-specific approaches to optimize restoration efforts and ensure the sustainable management of China’s D & DPRs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112220
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Ecological Restoration Programs Across China’s Desert and Desertification-Prone Regions by Integrating Vegetation Dynamics and Investment Data

Xunming Wang, Ying Pan, Jie Li
Land
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Ecological Restoration Programs Across China’s Desert and Desertification-Prone Regions by Integrating Vegetation Dynamics and Investment Data

Xunming Wang, Ying Pan, Jie Li
article en

Abstract

The fragile ecosystem of desert and desertification-prone regions (D & DPRs) in China is highly sensitive to climate change, landuse intensification, and human interventions such as deforestation and overgrazing. In response, large-scale ecological restoration programs have been implemented over the past decades, yet their effect and cost-effectiveness remain insufficiently understood. Here, by applying multi-source remote sensing data, employing the Geodetector model, and developing a Return on Investment (RI) index, we established a framework to quantify the ecological restoration effect and assess the cost-effectiveness of the ecological restoration programs launched in China’s D & DPRs. The results indicated that a marked shift in ecosystem dynamics occurred in 1999. A comparison of the pre-restoration (1982–1998) and post-restoration (1999–2020) periods revealed that the restoration and degradation occur simultaneously, with the proportions increasing by 15.5% and 21%, respectively. Spatially, the identified ecological restoration effect was concentrated in the northern Loess Plateau, the northeastern Inner Mongolia Plateau, and the Hexi Corridor, which were strongly linked to population, land management strategies and infrastructural accessibility. However, the cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that higher levels of ecological investment did not necessarily lead to greater ecological restoration effect. Instead, restoration efficiency varied substantially across different ecological and socio-economic contexts. These findings suggest that ecological restoration in China’s D & DPRs is not a uniform process but is contingent on social-ecological characteristics and investment strategies. Our results emphasize the need for adaptive, region-specific approaches to optimize restoration efforts and ensure the sustainable management of China’s D & DPRs.

LandVol. 14(11)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.