Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia as Primary Analgesic Management in the Orthopedic-Surgical Emergency Department of an Affiliated Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis over a 6-Year Period

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral regional anesthesia (pRA) is gaining increasing importance in emergency medicine as an effective, low-ridsk alternative to general anesthesia (GA), procedural sedation (PS), or opioid therapy. By enabling rapid, direct pain management in the emergency department (ED), pRA can help preserve scarce surgical and anesthetic resources and, in some cases, avoid inpatient admissions. The aim of this study was to analyze the indications, techniques, and clinical impact of pRA in the orthopedic-focused ED of an affiliated hospital. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: All pRA and PS procedures performed over a six-year period were retrospectively reviewed among 35,443 orthopedic-trauma emergency patients. pRA was carried out under US guidance with standardized monitoring. Diagnoses, block techniques, effectiveness, and complications were analyzed descriptively. <i>Results</i>: A total of 1292 patients (3.7%) underwent either pRA (<i>n</i> = 1117; 3.2%) or PS (<i>n</i> = 175; 0.5%). pRA was performed in 22% of cases for interventions such as reductions or extensive wound management. In 78%, pRA was applied for analgesia, for example, in the diagnostic work-up and treatment of non-immediately operable fractures, lumbago, or arthralgia. The most common pRA techniques were brachial plexus blocks (54%) and femoral nerve blocks (25%). Fascial plane blocks (6.1%) and paravertebral blocks (1.5%) were rarely used. PS was performed in 175 of 1292 patients (13%), although pRA would have been feasible in 159 of these cases. No complications of pRA were observed, and GA could routinely be avoided. <i>Conclusions</i>: US-guided pRA proved to be an effective and safe alternative to PS, GA, or systemic analgesia for selected indications, allowing immediate treatment without the need for operative capacities. To ensure safe application, these techniques should be an integral part of the training curriculum for ED personnel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61112006
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia as Primary Analgesic Management in the Orthopedic-Surgical Emergency Department of an Affiliated Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis over a 6-Year Period

E Schöll, R LITZ, Andreas M. Müller, Mark Ulrich Gerbershagen
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia as Primary Analgesic Management in the Orthopedic-Surgical Emergency Department of an Affiliated Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis over a 6-Year Period

E Schöll, R LITZ, Andreas M. Müller, Mark Ulrich Gerbershagen
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral regional anesthesia (pRA) is gaining increasing importance in emergency medicine as an effective, low-ridsk alternative to general anesthesia (GA), procedural sedation (PS), or opioid therapy. By enabling rapid, direct pain management in the emergency department (ED), pRA can help preserve scarce surgical and anesthetic resources and, in some cases, avoid inpatient admissions. The aim of this study was to analyze the indications, techniques, and clinical impact of pRA in the orthopedic-focused ED of an affiliated hospital. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: All pRA and PS procedures performed over a six-year period were retrospectively reviewed among 35,443 orthopedic-trauma emergency patients. pRA was carried out under US guidance with standardized monitoring. Diagnoses, block techniques, effectiveness, and complications were analyzed descriptively. <i>Results</i>: A total of 1292 patients (3.7%) underwent either pRA (<i>n</i> = 1117; 3.2%) or PS (<i>n</i> = 175; 0.5%). pRA was performed in 22% of cases for interventions such as reductions or extensive wound management. In 78%, pRA was applied for analgesia, for example, in the diagnostic work-up and treatment of non-immediately operable fractures, lumbago, or arthralgia. The most common pRA techniques were brachial plexus blocks (54%) and femoral nerve blocks (25%). Fascial plane blocks (6.1%) and paravertebral blocks (1.5%) were rarely used. PS was performed in 175 of 1292 patients (13%), although pRA would have been feasible in 159 of these cases. No complications of pRA were observed, and GA could routinely be avoided. <i>Conclusions</i>: US-guided pRA proved to be an effective and safe alternative to PS, GA, or systemic analgesia for selected indications, allowing immediate treatment without the need for operative capacities. To ensure safe application, these techniques should be an integral part of the training curriculum for ED personnel.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
Witten/Herdecke University (DE), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Bethesda Spital (CH), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Krankenhaus Köln-Holweide (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.