Cost-effectiveness of a periodic fasting-mimicking diet programme in patients with type 2 diabetes: a trial-based analysis and a lifetime model-based analysis

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to rise worldwide, which is associated with a decrease in quality of Life and an increase in healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to determine cost-effectiveness of a one year monthly 5-consecutive day fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) programme for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with lifestyle advice only or lifestyle advice plus metformin, compared to usual care. A trial-based cost-utility analysis with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs was performed. These results were extrapolated to a lifetime horizon using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model, predicting cardiovascular events and mortality. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were assessed, representing the probability of the FMD programme being cost-effective compared to usual care across a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds per QALY. In the trial-based analysis (n = 92), QALYs were insignificantly lower (-0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to + 0.03), while healthcare costs were significantly higher (+ €2241, 95% CI + 182 to + 2660) in the FMD group. In contrast, from a lifetime horizon, QALYs were insignificantly higher in the FMD group (+ 0.16, 95% CI -1.16 to + 1.48) and costs were insignificantly higher as well (+ €1336, 95% CI -753 to + 3425), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €8369/QALY. Thus, in the lifetime analysis the probability of cost-effectiveness of the FMD programme was around 0.6 as compared to usual care at most WTP thresholds. The FMD programme does not appear to be cost-effective over the first year of its application in the context of the Dutch healthcare system. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. In the extrapolations of the lifetime model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, a gain in QALYs in the FMD group was seen and the FMD programme’ costs were largely offset by savings in the costs of diabetic complications. This suggests that adding an FMD programme to usual care may potentially be cost-effective in the long term. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03811587. Registered 22 January 2019.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03027-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dietary Effects on Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of a periodic fasting-mimicking diet programme in patients with type 2 diabetes: a trial-based analysis and a lifetime model-based analysis

Marjolein P. Schoonakker, Elske L. van den Burg, Hanno Pijl, Andrea A. Esmeijer et al.
1 citations
BMC Primary Care
Dietary Effects on Health
1.16
article

Cost-effectiveness of a periodic fasting-mimicking diet programme in patients with type 2 diabetes: a trial-based analysis and a lifetime model-based analysis

Marjolein P. Schoonakker, Elske L. van den Burg, Hanno Pijl, Andrea A. Esmeijer, Hildo J. Lamb, Mattijs E. Numans, Petra G. van Peet, M. Elske van den Akker – van Marle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to rise worldwide, which is associated with a decrease in quality of Life and an increase in healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to determine cost-effectiveness of a one year monthly 5-consecutive day fasting-mimicking diet (FMD) programme for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with lifestyle advice only or lifestyle advice plus metformin, compared to usual care. A trial-based cost-utility analysis with quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs was performed. These results were extrapolated to a lifetime horizon using the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model, predicting cardiovascular events and mortality. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were assessed, representing the probability of the FMD programme being cost-effective compared to usual care across a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds per QALY. In the trial-based analysis (n = 92), QALYs were insignificantly lower (-0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to + 0.03), while healthcare costs were significantly higher (+ €2241, 95% CI + 182 to + 2660) in the FMD group. In contrast, from a lifetime horizon, QALYs were insignificantly higher in the FMD group (+ 0.16, 95% CI -1.16 to + 1.48) and costs were insignificantly higher as well (+ €1336, 95% CI -753 to + 3425), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €8369/QALY. Thus, in the lifetime analysis the probability of cost-effectiveness of the FMD programme was around 0.6 as compared to usual care at most WTP thresholds. The FMD programme does not appear to be cost-effective over the first year of its application in the context of the Dutch healthcare system. However, this conclusion should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. In the extrapolations of the lifetime model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, a gain in QALYs in the FMD group was seen and the FMD programme’ costs were largely offset by savings in the costs of diabetic complications. This suggests that adding an FMD programme to usual care may potentially be cost-effective in the long term. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03811587. Registered 22 January 2019.

BMC Primary CareVol. 26(1)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dietary Effects on Health
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.