The preliminary European multi-centre experience with G-Branch Endograft

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> To evaluate the short-term outcomes of a novel, customized multibranched G-Branch endograft for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (J/PAAA). <i>Patients and methods:</i> Between July 2023 and May 2025, 50 patients (mean age 72 years; 45 men) were treated with implantation of a customized G-Branch endograft (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) at four European regional vascular centres. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65.7 mm (range, 55-90 mm). Depending on the size and extent of the aortic pathology, 19 patients had J/PAAA and 31 had TAAA. Three patients had concomitant common iliac artery aneurysms, and one patient had a concomitant arch aneurysm. All patients underwent either an elective one-stage repair (30 patients, 60%) or a staged repair (20 patients, 40%) according to the local protocol of each centre. Multicentre outcome data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Perioperative results were assessed before discharge and during follow-ups at 1, 6, and 12 months. <i>Results:</i> Technical success was achieved in 96% (48/50) of patients. In-hospital mortality was 4% (2/50). Early perioperative complications occurred in six patients (11%), with no spinal cord ischemia. Over a mean follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-23 months), two patient (4%) required an unplanned late reintervention with branch extension or relining due to a type Ic and IIIb endoleaks, respectively. Of the 198 target vessels, all remained patent, yielding an overall freedom from branch instability of 99%. No patients died due to aneurysm- or procedure-related causes; one patient died 8 months postoperatively due to a major stroke. All remaining 47 patients were doing well at the last follow-up. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our preliminary experience with the G-Branch endograft appears safe and yields high technical success with encouraging short-term outcomes for the endovascular repair of J/PAAA and TAAA. Continued patient surveillance and extended follow-up are essential to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VASA
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001252
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The preliminary European multi-centre experience with G-Branch Endograft

Theodoros Kratimenos, Martin Austermann, Myrto Papadopoulou, H. A. Osman et al.
1 citations
VASA
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
1.52
article

The preliminary European multi-centre experience with G-Branch Endograft

Theodoros Kratimenos, Martin Austermann, Myrto Papadopoulou, H. A. Osman, Marco Virgilio Usai, Marwan Youssef, Meera Gunaseelan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b></b> <i>Background:</i> To evaluate the short-term outcomes of a novel, customized multibranched G-Branch endograft for the treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and juxta/pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (J/PAAA). <i>Patients and methods:</i> Between July 2023 and May 2025, 50 patients (mean age 72 years; 45 men) were treated with implantation of a customized G-Branch endograft (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) at four European regional vascular centres. The mean aneurysm diameter was 65.7 mm (range, 55-90 mm). Depending on the size and extent of the aortic pathology, 19 patients had J/PAAA and 31 had TAAA. Three patients had concomitant common iliac artery aneurysms, and one patient had a concomitant arch aneurysm. All patients underwent either an elective one-stage repair (30 patients, 60%) or a staged repair (20 patients, 40%) according to the local protocol of each centre. Multicentre outcome data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Perioperative results were assessed before discharge and during follow-ups at 1, 6, and 12 months. <i>Results:</i> Technical success was achieved in 96% (48/50) of patients. In-hospital mortality was 4% (2/50). Early perioperative complications occurred in six patients (11%), with no spinal cord ischemia. Over a mean follow-up of 7 months (range, 1-23 months), two patient (4%) required an unplanned late reintervention with branch extension or relining due to a type Ic and IIIb endoleaks, respectively. Of the 198 target vessels, all remained patent, yielding an overall freedom from branch instability of 99%. No patients died due to aneurysm- or procedure-related causes; one patient died 8 months postoperatively due to a major stroke. All remaining 47 patients were doing well at the last follow-up. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our preliminary experience with the G-Branch endograft appears safe and yields high technical success with encouraging short-term outcomes for the endovascular repair of J/PAAA and TAAA. Continued patient surveillance and extended follow-up are essential to confirm these results.

VASAVol. 55(2)
University Hospital Augsburg (DE), St. Franziskus Hospital (DE), Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg (DE), Evangelismos Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.