Educational outcomes of UK LGB and heterosexual adolescents: exploring gendered differences and mechanisms

Abstract Studies in the United States have repeatedly found that gay men and older cohorts of lesbian women have higher educational attainment than their heterosexual peers, whereas bisexual individuals and younger cohorts of lesbian women often face educational disadvantages. It remains unclear whether these findings apply to other national contexts and through which mechanisms differences in educational outcomes by sexual identity arise. Using UK longitudinal data from the ‘Millennium Cohort Study’, this study explores, for the first time in a European setting, the link between sexual identity, gender, and educational outcomes during adolescence. By comparing the achievements, subject choices, and educational expectations in a sample of heterosexual and Lesbian Gay and Bisexual students aged 16–18, we find evidence that gay boys outperform heterosexual boys in terms of grades and expectations. Unexpectedly, similar outcomes are also found for bisexual boys. In contrast, as lesbian girls have comparable grades and expectations to heterosexual girls, our findings do not support the idea of a ‘lesbian penalty’ in educational outcomes during high school in the United Kingdom. Overall, no single theory fully explains educational differences by sexual identities, emphasizing the necessity to account for the interplay between sexual identity and gender in evaluating students’ outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Sociological Review
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaf045
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational outcomes of UK LGB and heterosexual adolescents: exploring gendered differences and mechanisms

Agnese Vitali, Anna Caprinali
European Sociological Review
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Educational outcomes of UK LGB and heterosexual adolescents: exploring gendered differences and mechanisms

Agnese Vitali, Anna Caprinali
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies in the United States have repeatedly found that gay men and older cohorts of lesbian women have higher educational attainment than their heterosexual peers, whereas bisexual individuals and younger cohorts of lesbian women often face educational disadvantages. It remains unclear whether these findings apply to other national contexts and through which mechanisms differences in educational outcomes by sexual identity arise. Using UK longitudinal data from the ‘Millennium Cohort Study’, this study explores, for the first time in a European setting, the link between sexual identity, gender, and educational outcomes during adolescence. By comparing the achievements, subject choices, and educational expectations in a sample of heterosexual and Lesbian Gay and Bisexual students aged 16–18, we find evidence that gay boys outperform heterosexual boys in terms of grades and expectations. Unexpectedly, similar outcomes are also found for bisexual boys. In contrast, as lesbian girls have comparable grades and expectations to heterosexual girls, our findings do not support the idea of a ‘lesbian penalty’ in educational outcomes during high school in the United Kingdom. Overall, no single theory fully explains educational differences by sexual identities, emphasizing the necessity to account for the interplay between sexual identity and gender in evaluating students’ outcomes.

European Sociological Review
University of Trento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.