Risk of myocardial infarction following capecitabine treatment in patients with gastrointestinal cancer – a nationwide registry-based study

Myocardial infarction (MI) is an adverse event potentially associated with capecitabine treatment, potentially impacting the continuation of cancer therapy. However, data on its incidence remain limited. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treated with capecitabine (2004–2016) and compared them to age- and sex-matched controls without cancer. Patients with prior ischemic heart disease were excluded but were subsequently analyzed as a separate secondary cohort. Cumulative incidences of MI and competing risks were calculated, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. A total of 23,820 patients with GI cancer treated with capecitabine and 47,640 controls without cancer were included. Differences in comorbidities and antianginal medications were not significantly different (P > 0.05 for all). At 6 months, the cumulative incidence of MI was significantly higher for patients treated with capecitabine at 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.7%) versus 0.3% (95% CI: 0.3%-0.4%) in controls, with a competing risk of death of 15.2% versus 0.7%. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MI for patients receiving capecitabine was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6%-0.9%) versus 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.6%) among controls, with a competing risk for death of 29.7% versus 1.6%. After accounting for competing risks, the sub distribution hazard ratios indicated an increased risk of MI for patients receiving capecitabine compared with control subjects at both 6 months (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.57–2.60; P < 0.001) and 12 months (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.05–1.57; P = 0.015). Capecitabine treatment in GI cancer patients was associated with an increased MI risk at 6 and 12 months compared to controls, though absolute risks were low. Given the high competing mortality, the clinical relevance of this increased MI risk appears limited. In a secondary analysis of patients with known ischemic heart disease, our findings suggest that cardiovascular risk assessment and monitoring is warranted during capecitabine therapy, rather than routine avoidance of treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardio-Oncology
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00401-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of myocardial infarction following capecitabine treatment in patients with gastrointestinal cancer – a nationwide registry-based study

Lars Køber, Tarec Christoffer El‐Galaly, Gunnar Gislason, Manan Pareek et al.
1 citations
Cardio-Oncology
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
1.39
article

Risk of myocardial infarction following capecitabine treatment in patients with gastrointestinal cancer – a nationwide registry-based study

Lars Køber, Tarec Christoffer El‐Galaly, Gunnar Gislason, Manan Pareek, Phillip Freeman, Kristian Hay Kragholm, Laurids Østergaard Poulsen, Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen, Morten Schou, Peter Søgaard, Mamas Mamas, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Harman Yonis, Jan Walter Dhillon Shanmuganathan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) is an adverse event potentially associated with capecitabine treatment, potentially impacting the continuation of cancer therapy. However, data on its incidence remain limited. Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treated with capecitabine (2004–2016) and compared them to age- and sex-matched controls without cancer. Patients with prior ischemic heart disease were excluded but were subsequently analyzed as a separate secondary cohort. Cumulative incidences of MI and competing risks were calculated, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. A total of 23,820 patients with GI cancer treated with capecitabine and 47,640 controls without cancer were included. Differences in comorbidities and antianginal medications were not significantly different (P > 0.05 for all). At 6 months, the cumulative incidence of MI was significantly higher for patients treated with capecitabine at 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.7%) versus 0.3% (95% CI: 0.3%-0.4%) in controls, with a competing risk of death of 15.2% versus 0.7%. At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of MI for patients receiving capecitabine was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.6%-0.9%) versus 0.6% (95% CI: 0.5%-0.6%) among controls, with a competing risk for death of 29.7% versus 1.6%. After accounting for competing risks, the sub distribution hazard ratios indicated an increased risk of MI for patients receiving capecitabine compared with control subjects at both 6 months (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.57–2.60; P < 0.001) and 12 months (hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.05–1.57; P = 0.015). Capecitabine treatment in GI cancer patients was associated with an increased MI risk at 6 and 12 months compared to controls, though absolute risks were low. Given the high competing mortality, the clinical relevance of this increased MI risk appears limited. In a secondary analysis of patients with known ischemic heart disease, our findings suggest that cardiovascular risk assessment and monitoring is warranted during capecitabine therapy, rather than routine avoidance of treatment.

Cardio-OncologyVol. 11(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Keele University (GB), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.