Toxic Effects of Nanoplastics on Animals: Comparative Insights into Microplastic Toxicity

Nanoplastics have emerged as widespread environmental contaminants with toxicological properties that differ from those of microplastics. While existing reviews often examine their effects on specific organisms, they rarely provide direct comparisons with microplastics. This review aims to comprehensively assess the toxic effects of nanoplastics on animals, with a comparative perspective highlighting their distinctions from microplastics. In mammals, nanoplastics cross the blood–brain barrier and induce oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and synaptic disruption, with consequences ranging from cognitive impairment to Parkinson’s disease-like neurodegeneration. They also impair liver, kidney, intestinal, pancreatic, and reproductive function, with evidence of transgenerational toxicity. In aquatic organisms such as fish, crustaceans, bivalves, and aquatic invertebrates, nanoplastics compromise growth, immunity, reproduction, and metabolism, while in terrestrial invertebrates they cause gut toxicity, mitochondrial damage, immune suppression, and heritable defects. Across taxa, the dominant mechanisms involve oxidative stress, apoptosis, inflammation, and interference with metabolic and signaling pathways. Comparisons with microplastics reveal that while both particle types are harmful, nanoplastics generally exert stronger and more systemic effects due to higher bioavailability, cellular uptake, and molecular reactivity. Microplastics primarily impose mechanical stress, whereas nanoplastics disrupt cellular homeostasis at lower exposure levels, often acting at the subcellular level. Evidence also indicates size-, surface chemistry-, and concentration-dependent effects, with smaller and functionalized nanoplastics exhibiting heightened toxicity. Despite growing knowledge, significant gaps remain in cross-size comparative studies, long-term and multigenerational assessments, trophic transfer analyses, and investigations involving environmentally derived nanoplastics. Addressing these gaps is critical for advancing ecological risk assessment and developing mitigation strategies against plastic pollution.