Race, Disability, and Technology: A Call to Action for Accessibility Researchers

Examinations of intersectionality and identity dimensions in accessibility research have primarily considered disability separately from a person’s race, ethnicity, and culture. Accessibility work often does not include considerations of race as a construct, or treats race as a shallow demographic variable, if race is mentioned at all, or tends to conflate its designation with other proxies. The lack of attention to race as a construct and its interaction with other factors in accessibility research presents an oversight in our field. By systematically eliminating whole areas of need and vital perspectives from the work we do, this omits critical areas and domains of research inquiry. Further, there has been little focus on the intersection of race and disability within accessibility research, and the relevance of their interplay. When research in race or disability does not mention the other, this work overlooks the potential to better understand the full nuance of marginalized, minoritized, and “otherized” groups. To address this gap, our work highlights the value of considering how constructs of race and disability work alongside each other within accessibility research studies and the designs of socio-technical systems. We offer a framework for engaging the intersection of race and disability throughout the research process and present a series of case studies that showcase the potential of integrating racial equity perspectives into accessibility research. Along with providing recommendations toward establishing this research direction and guiding principles for approaching this intersection, our new analysis reflects on tensions and considerations that arise while pursuing this work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772276
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Race, Disability, and Technology: A Call to Action for Accessibility Researchers

Sanika Moharana, Aashaka Desai, Jennifer Mankoff, Aaleyah Lewis et al.
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Race, Disability, and Technology: A Call to Action for Accessibility Researchers

Sanika Moharana, Aashaka Desai, Jennifer Mankoff, Aaleyah Lewis, Anne Spencer Ross, Christina Harrington
article en

Abstract

Examinations of intersectionality and identity dimensions in accessibility research have primarily considered disability separately from a person’s race, ethnicity, and culture. Accessibility work often does not include considerations of race as a construct, or treats race as a shallow demographic variable, if race is mentioned at all, or tends to conflate its designation with other proxies. The lack of attention to race as a construct and its interaction with other factors in accessibility research presents an oversight in our field. By systematically eliminating whole areas of need and vital perspectives from the work we do, this omits critical areas and domains of research inquiry. Further, there has been little focus on the intersection of race and disability within accessibility research, and the relevance of their interplay. When research in race or disability does not mention the other, this work overlooks the potential to better understand the full nuance of marginalized, minoritized, and “otherized” groups. To address this gap, our work highlights the value of considering how constructs of race and disability work alongside each other within accessibility research studies and the designs of socio-technical systems. We offer a framework for engaging the intersection of race and disability throughout the research process and present a series of case studies that showcase the potential of integrating racial equity perspectives into accessibility research. Along with providing recommendations toward establishing this research direction and guiding principles for approaching this intersection, our new analysis reflects on tensions and considerations that arise while pursuing this work.

ACM Transactions on Accessible ComputingVol. 19(1)
Bucknell University (US), University of Washington (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.