AppQSim: Application-oriented benchmarks for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer

We introduce AppQSim, a benchmarking suite for quantum computers focused on applications of Hamiltonian simulation. We consider five different settings for which we define a precise task and score: condensed matter and material simulation (dynamic and static properties), nuclear magnetic resonance simulation, chemistry ground-state preparation, and classical optimization. These five different benchmark tasks display different resource requirements and scalability properties. We introduce a metric to evaluate the quality of the output of a tested quantum hardware, called distinguishability cost, defined as the minimal number of gates that a perfect quantum computer would have to run to certify that the output of the benchmarked hardware is incorrect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Research
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/qt55-7d6r
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AppQSim: Application-oriented benchmarks for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer

Etienne Granet, Henrik Dreyer
2 citations
Physical Review Research
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
article

AppQSim: Application-oriented benchmarks for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer

Etienne Granet, Henrik Dreyer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We introduce AppQSim, a benchmarking suite for quantum computers focused on applications of Hamiltonian simulation. We consider five different settings for which we define a precise task and score: condensed matter and material simulation (dynamic and static properties), nuclear magnetic resonance simulation, chemistry ground-state preparation, and classical optimization. These five different benchmark tasks display different resource requirements and scalability properties. We introduce a metric to evaluate the quality of the output of a tested quantum hardware, called distinguishability cost, defined as the minimal number of gates that a perfect quantum computer would have to run to certify that the output of the benchmarked hardware is incorrect.

Physical Review ResearchVol. 7(4)
Quantum Technologies (Sweden) (SE)
Bayerische Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Landesentwicklung und Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.