Data economy: A discussion on value, fictitious valorisation, and national sovereignty

In this article, we present elements for a critique of the notion of a new data economy, often portrayed as a distinct stage in capitalist development, allegedly detached from the model of flexible accumulation characteristic of the finance-dominated phase of regulation. From a Marxist perspective, we argue that data should be understood as crude raw material, devoid of value. It is only when mobilised by labour that they are transformed into informational raw material, capable of being incorporated into different production processes – as in the case of the audience-commodity – or of presenting themselves as a commodity in their own right: the information-commodity. We also put forward the hypothesis that, when simply extracted and traded as promises of future use in productive processes, crude data configure a new form of fictitious accumulation. Finally, we reflect on the oligopolistic control exercised by the big techs, most of them based in the United States, over immense volumes of data, as well as on the implications this dominance bears for the sovereignty of peripheral countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251396101
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data economy: A discussion on value, fictitious valorisation, and national sovereignty

César Bolaño, Fabrício Zanghelini
Big Data & Society
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Data economy: A discussion on value, fictitious valorisation, and national sovereignty

César Bolaño, Fabrício Zanghelini
article en

Abstract

In this article, we present elements for a critique of the notion of a new data economy, often portrayed as a distinct stage in capitalist development, allegedly detached from the model of flexible accumulation characteristic of the finance-dominated phase of regulation. From a Marxist perspective, we argue that data should be understood as crude raw material, devoid of value. It is only when mobilised by labour that they are transformed into informational raw material, capable of being incorporated into different production processes – as in the case of the audience-commodity – or of presenting themselves as a commodity in their own right: the information-commodity. We also put forward the hypothesis that, when simply extracted and traded as promises of future use in productive processes, crude data configure a new form of fictitious accumulation. Finally, we reflect on the oligopolistic control exercised by the big techs, most of them based in the United States, over immense volumes of data, as well as on the implications this dominance bears for the sovereignty of peripheral countries.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 12(4)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Data economy: A discussion on value, fictitious valorisation, and national sovereignty — César Bolaño, Fabrício Zanghelini · Big Data & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS