Poisson regression with adjustment for contamination and non-compliance in cohort studies conducted to estimate intervention effectiveness

BackgroundThe effectiveness of an intervention such as cancer screening can be estimated by conducting a cohort study estimating the rate ratio between an exposed group invited to screening and a control group not invited to screening. A common issue is non-compliance, where not all individuals in the study group are exposed. Ignoring non-compliance can result in biased estimates of the exposure effect, but excluding non-exposed individuals may also be problematic as they may differ in risk profile from those who were exposed. A similar problem arises when members of the control group are inadvertently exposed (contamination). Observational studies face additional challenges due to confounding.ObjectiveTo report the development of a method to adjust rate ratio estimates in cohort studies for contamination and non-compliance, that also adjusts for confounding.MethodDerivation of the new method is outlined.ResultsThe method is illustrated in two examples.ConclusionThe results are comparable with a stratified estimate, but through the use of a Poisson regression model the range of possible analyses is extended, for example to tests of confounding factors and interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251388380
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poisson regression with adjustment for contamination and non-compliance in cohort studies conducted to estimate intervention effectiveness

Håkan Jönsson, Johannes Blom, Lennarth Nyström
1 citations
Journal of Medical Screening
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
article

Poisson regression with adjustment for contamination and non-compliance in cohort studies conducted to estimate intervention effectiveness

Håkan Jönsson, Johannes Blom, Lennarth Nyström
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe effectiveness of an intervention such as cancer screening can be estimated by conducting a cohort study estimating the rate ratio between an exposed group invited to screening and a control group not invited to screening. A common issue is non-compliance, where not all individuals in the study group are exposed. Ignoring non-compliance can result in biased estimates of the exposure effect, but excluding non-exposed individuals may also be problematic as they may differ in risk profile from those who were exposed. A similar problem arises when members of the control group are inadvertently exposed (contamination). Observational studies face additional challenges due to confounding.ObjectiveTo report the development of a method to adjust rate ratio estimates in cohort studies for contamination and non-compliance, that also adjusts for confounding.MethodDerivation of the new method is outlined.ResultsThe method is illustrated in two examples.ConclusionThe results are comparable with a stratified estimate, but through the use of a Poisson regression model the range of possible analyses is extended, for example to tests of confounding factors and interaction.

Journal of Medical Screening
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.