Reconsidering anthropocentrism: Local young people's perspectives on the 2018 Winter Olympics’ developmental and environmental impacts

Sport mega-events such as the Olympic Games can bring both socio-economic benefits and environmental risks to hosts. While literature on the environmental impacts of mega-events has focused on contemporary capitalism and its human-centred imperatives as causal sources of environmental degradation, analysis remains relatively indifferent to how people at the scene view the outcomes of these events. Drawing upon two competing environmental ethics (anthropocentrism and ecocentrism) as conceptual tools, this paper examines how young people from the hosting areas of Pyeongchang 2018 interpret the relative significance of the developmental benefits and environmental damages. Semi-structured interviews with 15 local young people reveal three dimensions of their anthropocentric views: (a) valuing nature based on human circumstances, (b) perceiving developmental benefits as tangible but environmental impacts as distant and (c) viewing the Olympics as a means to address regional inequalities in development. Given that the predominance of anthropocentric thinking among young people derives from the region's long-standing underdevelopment, this paper argues that understanding anthropocentric views provides a crucial foundation for addressing environmental challenges. As environmental problems are inherently social and require collective action, human needs and frustrations should be considered and addressed for environmentalism to achieve meaningful impact and gain momentum in contemporary society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902251394018
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering anthropocentrism: Local young people's perspectives on the 2018 Winter Olympics’ developmental and environmental impacts

Dominic Malcolm, Minhyeok Tak, Nik Dickerson, Sihyeong Cho
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Reconsidering anthropocentrism: Local young people's perspectives on the 2018 Winter Olympics’ developmental and environmental impacts

Dominic Malcolm, Minhyeok Tak, Nik Dickerson, Sihyeong Cho
article en

Abstract

Sport mega-events such as the Olympic Games can bring both socio-economic benefits and environmental risks to hosts. While literature on the environmental impacts of mega-events has focused on contemporary capitalism and its human-centred imperatives as causal sources of environmental degradation, analysis remains relatively indifferent to how people at the scene view the outcomes of these events. Drawing upon two competing environmental ethics (anthropocentrism and ecocentrism) as conceptual tools, this paper examines how young people from the hosting areas of Pyeongchang 2018 interpret the relative significance of the developmental benefits and environmental damages. Semi-structured interviews with 15 local young people reveal three dimensions of their anthropocentric views: (a) valuing nature based on human circumstances, (b) perceiving developmental benefits as tangible but environmental impacts as distant and (c) viewing the Olympics as a means to address regional inequalities in development. Given that the predominance of anthropocentric thinking among young people derives from the region's long-standing underdevelopment, this paper argues that understanding anthropocentric views provides a crucial foundation for addressing environmental challenges. As environmental problems are inherently social and require collective action, human needs and frustrations should be considered and addressed for environmentalism to achieve meaningful impact and gain momentum in contemporary society.

International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.