FDI-Driven Graduation of Botswana and Equatorial Guinea from Least-Developed Countries: Challenges Ahead

Botswana and Equatorial Guinea (EG) stand out among resource-rich African least developed countries in that they successfully used FDI in natural resources to avoid the resource curse and to advance to the group of upper-middle income (UMI) countries. However, they have fallen into the middle-income trap. Botswana’s growth has slowed down, and EG has run into a deep crisis and lost much of the earlier income gains, remaining however an UMI country. Overcoming the trap requires a new growth model, featuring diversification towards more productive and dynamic activities, based on private sector investment, including FDI. We identify industries for diversification and provide insights into required policy actions and institutions. Generic policy actions are the same for both Botswana and EG and, for that matter, any country dependent on FDI in natural resources. Specific actions differ because they are determined by both countries’ resource endowments (defining areas for diversification), governance systems (democracy vs. autocracy), geographical location (land-locked vs. maritime country), institutions (e.g., advanced FDI promotion in Botswana and the lack of it in EG) and situations in five policy areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIB Insights
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.146365
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FDI-Driven Graduation of Botswana and Equatorial Guinea from Least-Developed Countries: Challenges Ahead

Zbigniew Zimny
AIB Insights
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

FDI-Driven Graduation of Botswana and Equatorial Guinea from Least-Developed Countries: Challenges Ahead

Zbigniew Zimny
article en

Abstract

Botswana and Equatorial Guinea (EG) stand out among resource-rich African least developed countries in that they successfully used FDI in natural resources to avoid the resource curse and to advance to the group of upper-middle income (UMI) countries. However, they have fallen into the middle-income trap. Botswana’s growth has slowed down, and EG has run into a deep crisis and lost much of the earlier income gains, remaining however an UMI country. Overcoming the trap requires a new growth model, featuring diversification towards more productive and dynamic activities, based on private sector investment, including FDI. We identify industries for diversification and provide insights into required policy actions and institutions. Generic policy actions are the same for both Botswana and EG and, for that matter, any country dependent on FDI in natural resources. Specific actions differ because they are determined by both countries’ resource endowments (defining areas for diversification), governance systems (democracy vs. autocracy), geographical location (land-locked vs. maritime country), institutions (e.g., advanced FDI promotion in Botswana and the lack of it in EG) and situations in five policy areas.

AIB InsightsVol. 26(1)
Vistula University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.