Pulled fronts are not (just) pulled

Front propagation into unstable states is often determined by the linearization; that is, propagation speeds agree with predictions from the linearized equation at the unstable state. The leading edge behavior is then a Gaussian tail propagating with the linear spreading speed. Fronts following this leading edge are commonly referred to as pulled fronts, alluding to the idea that they are “pulled” by this leading edge Gaussian tail. We describe here a class of examples that exhibits how these leading order effects do not completely describe the dynamics in the wake of the front. In fact, leading edge behavior predicts at most two possible invasion scenarios, associated with positive and negative amplitudes of the Gaussian tail, but our examples exhibit three or more invasion fronts with different states in the wake. The resulting invasion process therefore leaves behind a state that is not solely determined by the leading edge and thus not just pulled by the Gaussian tail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1734
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulled fronts are not (just) pulled

Montie Avery, Arnd Scheel, Matt Holzer
Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Pulled fronts are not (just) pulled

Montie Avery, Arnd Scheel, Matt Holzer
article en

Abstract

Front propagation into unstable states is often determined by the linearization; that is, propagation speeds agree with predictions from the linearized equation at the unstable state. The leading edge behavior is then a Gaussian tail propagating with the linear spreading speed. Fronts following this leading edge are commonly referred to as pulled fronts, alluding to the idea that they are “pulled” by this leading edge Gaussian tail. We describe here a class of examples that exhibits how these leading order effects do not completely describe the dynamics in the wake of the front. In fact, leading edge behavior predicts at most two possible invasion scenarios, associated with positive and negative amplitudes of the Gaussian tail, but our examples exhibit three or more invasion fronts with different states in the wake. The resulting invasion process therefore leaves behind a state that is not solely determined by the leading edge and thus not just pulled by the Gaussian tail.

Quarterly of Applied MathematicsVol. 84(2)
University of Minnesota (US), Emory University (US), George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.