Switching between Newly Learned Motor Skills

Studies of cognitive flexibility suggest that switching between different tasks can entail a transient switch cost. Here, we asked whether analogous switch costs exist in the context of switching between different motor skills. We tested whether participants (23 males and 12 females) could switch between a newly learned skill associated with a novel visuomotor mapping and an existing skill associated with an intuitive mapping. Participants showed increased errors in trials immediately following a switch between mappings. These errors were attributable to persisting with the preswitch policy rather than imperfect implementation or retrieval of the postswitch policy. A subset of our participants further learned a second new skill. Switching between these two novel skills was initially very challenging but improved with further training. Our findings suggest that switching between newly learned motor skills can be challenging and that errors in the context of switching between skills are primarily attributable to perseveration with the wrong control policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1311-24.2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Switching between Newly Learned Motor Skills

Kahori Kita, Adrian M. Haith, Yue Du, Thị Ngọc Huyền Trần
1 citations
Journal of Neuroscience
Motor Control and Adaptation
1.43
article

Switching between Newly Learned Motor Skills

Kahori Kita, Adrian M. Haith, Yue Du, Thị Ngọc Huyền Trần
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Studies of cognitive flexibility suggest that switching between different tasks can entail a transient switch cost. Here, we asked whether analogous switch costs exist in the context of switching between different motor skills. We tested whether participants (23 males and 12 females) could switch between a newly learned skill associated with a novel visuomotor mapping and an existing skill associated with an intuitive mapping. Participants showed increased errors in trials immediately following a switch between mappings. These errors were attributable to persisting with the preswitch policy rather than imperfect implementation or retrieval of the postswitch policy. A subset of our participants further learned a second new skill. Switching between these two novel skills was initially very challenging but improved with further training. Our findings suggest that switching between newly learned motor skills can be challenging and that errors in the context of switching between skills are primarily attributable to perseveration with the wrong control policy.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 45(50)
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Motor Control and Adaptation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Switching between Newly Learned Motor Skills — Kahori Kita, Adrian M. Haith, et al. · Journal of Neuroscience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS