A quantitative model‐based approach for adavosertib dose selection in patients with uterine serous carcinoma

The approach identifies risk factors that can aid in the decision to use a 250-mg monotherapy dose. This regimen may manage haematological toxicities across studies. A quantitative model-based approach predicts that reducing adavosertib doses minimizes risks, underscoring the need for dose adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70336
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A quantitative model‐based approach for adavosertib dose selection in patients with uterine serous carcinoma

Kowser Miah, Diansong Zhou, Victoria de Giorgio‐Miller, Didier Meulendijks et al.
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

A quantitative model‐based approach for adavosertib dose selection in patients with uterine serous carcinoma

Kowser Miah, Diansong Zhou, Victoria de Giorgio‐Miller, Didier Meulendijks, Jincheng Yang, Lynda Grinsted, Damilola Olabode, Karthick Vishwanathan, Srinivas Bachina, Dana Ghiorghiu, Megan Gibbs, George Kirk, Shankar Lanke
article en

Abstract

The approach identifies risk factors that can aid in the decision to use a 250-mg monotherapy dose. This regimen may manage haematological toxicities across studies. A quantitative model-based approach predicts that reducing adavosertib doses minimizes risks, underscoring the need for dose adjustment.

British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 92(3)
AstraZeneca (South Korea) (KR), AstraZeneca (Singapore) (SG), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), AstraZeneca (Spain) (ES)
AstraZeneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.