Correcting for selection bias after conditioning on a sum score in the Ising model

In psychological studies, it is common practice to select a sample based on the sum score of the modeled variables (e.g., based on symptom severity when investigating the associations between those same symptoms). However, this practice introduces bias if the sum score selection imperfectly defines the population of interest. Here, we propose a correction for this type of selection bias in the Ising model, a popular network model for binary data. Possible applications of our correction are when one wants to obtain (1) full population estimates when only the sum score subset of the data is available, and (2) improved estimates of a subpopulation, if we observe a mixture of populations that differ from each other in the sum score. In a simulation study, we verify that our correction recovers the network structure of the desired population after a sum score selection using both a node-wise regression and a multivariate estimation of the Ising model. In an example, we show how our correction can be used in practice using empirical data on symptoms of major depression from the National Comorbidity Study Replication (N = 9,282). We implemented our correction in four commonly used R packages for estimating the Ising model, namely IsingFit, IsingSampler, psychonetrics, and bootnet.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02820-1
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correcting for selection bias after conditioning on a sum score in the Ising model

Jill de Ron, J.C. Boot, Jonas M B Haslbeck, Sacha Epskamp
Behavior Research Methods
Mental Health Research Topics
article

Correcting for selection bias after conditioning on a sum score in the Ising model

Jill de Ron, J.C. Boot, Jonas M B Haslbeck, Sacha Epskamp
article en

Abstract

In psychological studies, it is common practice to select a sample based on the sum score of the modeled variables (e.g., based on symptom severity when investigating the associations between those same symptoms). However, this practice introduces bias if the sum score selection imperfectly defines the population of interest. Here, we propose a correction for this type of selection bias in the Ising model, a popular network model for binary data. Possible applications of our correction are when one wants to obtain (1) full population estimates when only the sum score subset of the data is available, and (2) improved estimates of a subpopulation, if we observe a mixture of populations that differ from each other in the sum score. In a simulation study, we verify that our correction recovers the network structure of the desired population after a sum score selection using both a node-wise regression and a multivariate estimation of the Ising model. In an example, we show how our correction can be used in practice using empirical data on symptoms of major depression from the National Comorbidity Study Replication (N = 9,282). We implemented our correction in four commonly used R packages for estimating the Ising model, namely IsingFit, IsingSampler, psychonetrics, and bootnet.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 57(12)
National University of Singapore (SG), Maastricht University (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.