Key geometric error identification method for ultra precision machine tool based on error-position-dependent sensitivity analysis

The geometric errors of ultra-precision machine tools have a significant impact on the contour accuracy and surface quality of optical components. Due to the diversity and coupling of geometric error sources, the decoupling and propagation mechanisms of the comprehensive errors become highly complex. Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a widely adopted quantitative tool for evaluating the relative contributions of error sources and identifying the key errors. However, conventional SA methods typically assume a constant error range across the entire workspace, thereby neglecting the position-dependent characteristics of specific geometric errors. To fill this gap, this study proposes a key geometric error identification method based on an error-position-dependent sensitivity analysis (EPDSA), which dynamically adjusts the input ranges of geometric errors according to their positions and calculates sensitivity indices across the entire workspace. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively captures pronounced spatial variations in sensitivity indices, leading to distinct key error identifications compared with conventional methods. The key error ratio (KER) further indicates that the key errors identified by EPDSA account for a larger proportion of the total error, 0.55 compared with 0.39 for the conventional method, thereby enabling more accurate and reliable sensitivity evaluation and offering targeted guidance for error compensation in ultra-precision machine tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.578911
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key geometric error identification method for ultra precision machine tool based on error-position-dependent sensitivity analysis

Zengya Zhao, Ming Huang, Jiasheng Li, Hong Yang et al.
1 citations
Optics Express
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
0.71
article

Key geometric error identification method for ultra precision machine tool based on error-position-dependent sensitivity analysis

Zengya Zhao, Ming Huang, Jiasheng Li, Hong Yang, Kai Xu, Rulong Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The geometric errors of ultra-precision machine tools have a significant impact on the contour accuracy and surface quality of optical components. Due to the diversity and coupling of geometric error sources, the decoupling and propagation mechanisms of the comprehensive errors become highly complex. Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a widely adopted quantitative tool for evaluating the relative contributions of error sources and identifying the key errors. However, conventional SA methods typically assume a constant error range across the entire workspace, thereby neglecting the position-dependent characteristics of specific geometric errors. To fill this gap, this study proposes a key geometric error identification method based on an error-position-dependent sensitivity analysis (EPDSA), which dynamically adjusts the input ranges of geometric errors according to their positions and calculates sensitivity indices across the entire workspace. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively captures pronounced spatial variations in sensitivity indices, leading to distinct key error identifications compared with conventional methods. The key error ratio (KER) further indicates that the key errors identified by EPDSA account for a larger proportion of the total error, 0.55 compared with 0.39 for the conventional method, thereby enabling more accurate and reliable sensitivity evaluation and offering targeted guidance for error compensation in ultra-precision machine tools.

Optics ExpressVol. 33(24)
China Academy of Engineering Physics (CN), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.