Evaluation of the Unified Forecast System Air Quality Model (UFS‐AQM) Online Air Quality Prediction System During the 2020 US Wildfire Season

Abstract In 2020, a record‐breaking 10.1 million acres burned in US wildfires. To investigate this prolific fire season's impacts on US air quality, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s 72‐hr Unified Forecast System Air Quality Model (UFS‐AQM) is run once‐daily from 15 August–30 September 2020. A meteorological and air quality‐based forecast verification is carried out for this period. The 72‐hr forecasts of near‐surface temperature, moisture, and winds perform quite well against observations in terms of correlation and bias. The UFS‐AQM surface ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) often concur with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AirNow station data, though the model ozone displays a consistent positive bias ranging from 8.5 to 15.4 ppb. Anomalously poor PM 2.5 predictions are identified during extreme wildfire activity in the Pacific Northwest between 13 and 20 September. Here, in addition to periods of widespread cloudiness, smoke is quite thick. As a result, fire activity is obscured from satellite detection. The UFS‐AQM thus underestimates wildfire emissions in the Pacific Northwest. The lack of dynamic aerosol–radiation interactions in UFS‐AQM coupled with uncertainties in fire emissions leads to a large underestimation of surface PM 2.5 there, along with high temperature and low humidity biases. Finally, satellite‐based measurements are also employed to evaluate the UFS‐AQM's performance in the deeper troposphere. The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite 550‐nm aerosol optical depth provides additional insights into the UFS‐AQM's handling of smoke transport, while the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument suggests UFS‐AQM suffers from overpredictions of NO 2 and CO in active fire regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jd044456
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Unified Forecast System Air Quality Model (UFS‐AQM) Online Air Quality Prediction System During the 2020 US Wildfire Season

Wenfu Tang, Rajesh Kumar, Stefano Alessandrini, Chan‐Hoo Jeon et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
article

Evaluation of the Unified Forecast System Air Quality Model (UFS‐AQM) Online Air Quality Prediction System During the 2020 US Wildfire Season

Wenfu Tang, Rajesh Kumar, Stefano Alessandrini, Chan‐Hoo Jeon, Jared A. Lee, Patrick Campbell, David Fillmore, Christopher M. Rozoff, Jianping Huang, Paddy McCarthy
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2020, a record‐breaking 10.1 million acres burned in US wildfires. To investigate this prolific fire season's impacts on US air quality, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s 72‐hr Unified Forecast System Air Quality Model (UFS‐AQM) is run once‐daily from 15 August–30 September 2020. A meteorological and air quality‐based forecast verification is carried out for this period. The 72‐hr forecasts of near‐surface temperature, moisture, and winds perform quite well against observations in terms of correlation and bias. The UFS‐AQM surface ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) often concur with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AirNow station data, though the model ozone displays a consistent positive bias ranging from 8.5 to 15.4 ppb. Anomalously poor PM 2.5 predictions are identified during extreme wildfire activity in the Pacific Northwest between 13 and 20 September. Here, in addition to periods of widespread cloudiness, smoke is quite thick. As a result, fire activity is obscured from satellite detection. The UFS‐AQM thus underestimates wildfire emissions in the Pacific Northwest. The lack of dynamic aerosol–radiation interactions in UFS‐AQM coupled with uncertainties in fire emissions leads to a large underestimation of surface PM 2.5 there, along with high temperature and low humidity biases. Finally, satellite‐based measurements are also employed to evaluate the UFS‐AQM's performance in the deeper troposphere. The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite 550‐nm aerosol optical depth provides additional insights into the UFS‐AQM's handling of smoke transport, while the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument suggests UFS‐AQM suffers from overpredictions of NO 2 and CO in active fire regions.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(22)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US), Research Applications (United States) (US), Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (US), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.