Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods

Quantifying facility-level methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions is an important task for measuring progress toward net zero and carbon emission reduction targets. Landfills are a significant source of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in Canada. Quantifying Canadian landfill emissions is also critical for validating assumptions in bottom-up inventory calculations but is a challenging task because of their variability in emissions sources and complex topography on and near landfill sites. We compare CH<sub>4</sub> emissions estimates for seven different emissions quantification strategies and platforms at a large landfill in Southern Ontario, Canada. We compare ground-based, aircraft-based, and satellite-based remote sensing techniques in addition to ground-based stationary, mobile, and aircraft-based in situ observation strategies across a 3.5-year period, including a 28-month deployment of a low-precision sensor network for continuous monitoring. Each methodology quantified a large range of emissions rates that vary by 1 order of magnitude for the site (∼200-2000 kg·h<sup>-1</sup>), and the average estimated emissions rates agree within uncertainty. We find that the remote sensing methods have a higher empirical minimum detection limit and are sufficient for quantifying 20-50% of all Canadian landfill sites, while ground-based in situ methods have detection limits suitable for quantifying emissions from the majority of accessible landfill sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00127
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods

Felix Vogel, Lawson Gillespie, Debra Wunch, Daniel Cusworth et al.
1 citations
ACS ES&T Air
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
1.00
article

Comparison of Landfill Methane Emission Quantification Using Multiple Observation Methods

Felix Vogel, Lawson Gillespie, Debra Wunch, Daniel Cusworth, Sébastien Ars, Halley Brantley, Roger Green, Cassandra Worthy, Tia R. Scarpelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantifying facility-level methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions is an important task for measuring progress toward net zero and carbon emission reduction targets. Landfills are a significant source of anthropogenic CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in Canada. Quantifying Canadian landfill emissions is also critical for validating assumptions in bottom-up inventory calculations but is a challenging task because of their variability in emissions sources and complex topography on and near landfill sites. We compare CH<sub>4</sub> emissions estimates for seven different emissions quantification strategies and platforms at a large landfill in Southern Ontario, Canada. We compare ground-based, aircraft-based, and satellite-based remote sensing techniques in addition to ground-based stationary, mobile, and aircraft-based in situ observation strategies across a 3.5-year period, including a 28-month deployment of a low-precision sensor network for continuous monitoring. Each methodology quantified a large range of emissions rates that vary by 1 order of magnitude for the site (∼200-2000 kg·h<sup>-1</sup>), and the average estimated emissions rates agree within uncertainty. We find that the remote sensing methods have a higher empirical minimum detection limit and are sufficient for quantifying 20-50% of all Canadian landfill sites, while ground-based in situ methods have detection limits suitable for quantifying emissions from the majority of accessible landfill sites.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 2(12)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), University of Toronto (CA), WestCon Medical (United States) (US), Mapp Biopharmaceutical (United States) (US), Generation 2 Materials Technology (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.