Causal Model Analysis of the Impact of Formalism, Psychological Contract and Safety Coaching on Safety Compliance and Participation in Taiwan

This study primarily investigates the influence of safety coaching, psychological contract, and safety knowledge on safety compliance and safety participation among construction workers. Specifically, the research examines the effect of safety formalism on workers’ psychological contract, which in turn influences their safety behaviors on-site. The issue of construction workers not strictly adhering to safety regulations is a topic that has rarely been explored by past researchers of construction safety behavior. To address this, the study collected 99 valid samples and utilized confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. A structural equation model (SEM) was then employed to test the established hypotheses. The research findings confirm, as follows: Safety formalism negatively influences psychological contract. Safety coaching positively influences safety knowledge. Safety knowledge and resilience positively influence both safety compliance and safety participation. Safety compliance positively influences safety participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224055
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal Model Analysis of the Impact of Formalism, Psychological Contract and Safety Coaching on Safety Compliance and Participation in Taiwan

Chi-Jan Huang, Hsiang-Te Liu, Tsung-Lin Wu
Buildings
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Causal Model Analysis of the Impact of Formalism, Psychological Contract and Safety Coaching on Safety Compliance and Participation in Taiwan

Chi-Jan Huang, Hsiang-Te Liu, Tsung-Lin Wu
article en

Abstract

This study primarily investigates the influence of safety coaching, psychological contract, and safety knowledge on safety compliance and safety participation among construction workers. Specifically, the research examines the effect of safety formalism on workers’ psychological contract, which in turn influences their safety behaviors on-site. The issue of construction workers not strictly adhering to safety regulations is a topic that has rarely been explored by past researchers of construction safety behavior. To address this, the study collected 99 valid samples and utilized confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. A structural equation model (SEM) was then employed to test the established hypotheses. The research findings confirm, as follows: Safety formalism negatively influences psychological contract. Safety coaching positively influences safety knowledge. Safety knowledge and resilience positively influence both safety compliance and safety participation. Safety compliance positively influences safety participation.

BuildingsVol. 15(22)
Ming Chuan University (TW), I-Shou University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.