Evaluation of a panel of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in a diverse research cohort

BackgroundPlasma biomarkers show significant promise for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostics and risk prediction, however, much less is known about how these assays perform in a diverse research cohort of older adults.ObjectiveTo compare plasma biomarkers with clinical diagnoses and assess variability by demographic factors in a diverse research cohort.MethodsAmong 331 University of Michigan Memory and Aging Project (UM-MAP) participants, plasma biomarkers (pTau-217, pTau-181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ<sub>42</sub>, Aβ<sub>40</sub>, t-Tau) were measured. Demographic information (age, sex, education, race) was self-reported. Clinical consensus phenotypes (dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), cognitively unimpaired (CU) were based on neuropsychological assessments. Logistic regression with machine learning for model variable selection was used to compare participants by clinical phenotypes.ResultsComparing CU and DAT participants, areas under the curve (AUCs) from receiver operator characteristic curves of single biomarker models ranged from 0.74-0.89. Optimal performance (AUC 99.7) was observed from stepwise regression with backward selection, which identified pTau-217, GFAP, sex, education, <i>APOE</i> ε4 allele, and race as model variables. When comparing MCI and DAT participants, only pTau-217 differed significantly (AUC 0.80). pTau-181 and pTau-217 levels were higher in white participants than Black/African American participants across all clinical phenotypes.ConclusionsPlasma biomarkers demonstrate promise for improving diagnostic accuracy in diverse research cohorts. Incorporating demographic variables facilitates enhanced interpretability of biomarker levels and the development of reference ranges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251393405
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a panel of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in a diverse research cohort

Kelly N DuBois, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Judith L. Heidebrink, Nicholas M. Kanaan et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Evaluation of a panel of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in a diverse research cohort

Kelly N DuBois, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Judith L. Heidebrink, Nicholas M. Kanaan, Matthew Perkins, David Morgan, Jonathan M. Reader, Kelly M. Bakulski, Brianna Jackman, Subhamoy Pal, Nahla Khobeir
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPlasma biomarkers show significant promise for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostics and risk prediction, however, much less is known about how these assays perform in a diverse research cohort of older adults.ObjectiveTo compare plasma biomarkers with clinical diagnoses and assess variability by demographic factors in a diverse research cohort.MethodsAmong 331 University of Michigan Memory and Aging Project (UM-MAP) participants, plasma biomarkers (pTau-217, pTau-181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ<sub>42</sub>, Aβ<sub>40</sub>, t-Tau) were measured. Demographic information (age, sex, education, race) was self-reported. Clinical consensus phenotypes (dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), cognitively unimpaired (CU) were based on neuropsychological assessments. Logistic regression with machine learning for model variable selection was used to compare participants by clinical phenotypes.ResultsComparing CU and DAT participants, areas under the curve (AUCs) from receiver operator characteristic curves of single biomarker models ranged from 0.74-0.89. Optimal performance (AUC 99.7) was observed from stepwise regression with backward selection, which identified pTau-217, GFAP, sex, education, <i>APOE</i> ε4 allele, and race as model variables. When comparing MCI and DAT participants, only pTau-217 differed significantly (AUC 0.80). pTau-181 and pTau-217 levels were higher in white participants than Black/African American participants across all clinical phenotypes.ConclusionsPlasma biomarkers demonstrate promise for improving diagnostic accuracy in diverse research cohorts. Incorporating demographic variables facilitates enhanced interpretability of biomarker levels and the development of reference ranges.

Journal of Alzheimer s DiseaseVol. 109(1)
University of Michigan (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Trinity Health Grand Rapids (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.