Differential response to acute ischemia between isolated contracting hearts and hearts perfused with excitation-contraction uncouplers

Acute myocardial ischemia triggers electrophysiological changes, including altered cardiac action potential and conduction slowing. Optical mapping is widely used to study these changes, but most experiments use excitation-contraction uncouplers to suppress contractile motion and motion artifacts. We hypothesized that contraction suppression with these uncouplers masks ischemic effects, leading to misleading results. We compared Langendorff-perfused, noncontracting hearts treated with blebbistatin to contracting hearts under acute ischemic conditions. Optical mapping with emission ratiometry and motion-tracking postprocessing minimized motion artifacts, whereas ischemia was induced by ligating the obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. Contracting hearts exhibited faster and more pronounced reductions in action potential duration (APD) and action potential triangulation (2 min vs. 14 min), along with an increased incidence of spatially discordant alternans (SDA). They also displayed steeper APD restitution slopes, whereas these slopes were flattened in noncontracting hearts. These differences may stem from reduced metabolic demands and the absence of mechanoelectric feedback in noncontracting hearts. In contrast, contracting hearts, with higher metabolic activity and mechanical feedback, experienced more severe ischemic changes. These findings highlight the limitations of using blebbistatin-treated, noncontracting hearts in electrophysiological research, as critical ischemic effects may be underestimated. This study underscores the need to integrate mechanical and electrical dynamics in preclinical models to accurately replicate ischemic conditions, enhancing the translational relevance of experimental cardiac research.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study highlights key differences in acute ischemic responses between contracting and blebbistatin-treated noncontracting rabbit hearts. Contracting hearts showed faster, more severe action potential duration reductions, increased spatially discordant alternans, and steeper restitution slopes, emphasizing the role of mechanoelectric feedback and higher metabolic demands. These findings challenge reliance on noncontracting models in electrophysiological research, underscoring the need for models integrating mechanical and electrical dynamics to improve the translational relevance of ischemic studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00169.2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential response to acute ischemia between isolated contracting hearts and hearts perfused with excitation-contraction uncouplers

Jan Lebert, Anies Sohi, Danya Agha-Jaffar, Jan Christoph et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
1.39
article

Differential response to acute ischemia between isolated contracting hearts and hearts perfused with excitation-contraction uncouplers

Jan Lebert, Anies Sohi, Danya Agha-Jaffar, Jan Christoph, Johanna Tonko, Fu Siong Ng, Zhen Hua, Yasser Abdelghani, Vineesh Kappadan, Nicholas S. Peters, N Mohamed, X P Sun, Paraskevas Efstathiou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Acute myocardial ischemia triggers electrophysiological changes, including altered cardiac action potential and conduction slowing. Optical mapping is widely used to study these changes, but most experiments use excitation-contraction uncouplers to suppress contractile motion and motion artifacts. We hypothesized that contraction suppression with these uncouplers masks ischemic effects, leading to misleading results. We compared Langendorff-perfused, noncontracting hearts treated with blebbistatin to contracting hearts under acute ischemic conditions. Optical mapping with emission ratiometry and motion-tracking postprocessing minimized motion artifacts, whereas ischemia was induced by ligating the obtuse marginal branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. Contracting hearts exhibited faster and more pronounced reductions in action potential duration (APD) and action potential triangulation (2 min vs. 14 min), along with an increased incidence of spatially discordant alternans (SDA). They also displayed steeper APD restitution slopes, whereas these slopes were flattened in noncontracting hearts. These differences may stem from reduced metabolic demands and the absence of mechanoelectric feedback in noncontracting hearts. In contrast, contracting hearts, with higher metabolic activity and mechanical feedback, experienced more severe ischemic changes. These findings highlight the limitations of using blebbistatin-treated, noncontracting hearts in electrophysiological research, as critical ischemic effects may be underestimated. This study underscores the need to integrate mechanical and electrical dynamics in preclinical models to accurately replicate ischemic conditions, enhancing the translational relevance of experimental cardiac research.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study highlights key differences in acute ischemic responses between contracting and blebbistatin-treated noncontracting rabbit hearts. Contracting hearts showed faster, more severe action potential duration reductions, increased spatially discordant alternans, and steeper restitution slopes, emphasizing the role of mechanoelectric feedback and higher metabolic demands. These findings challenge reliance on noncontracting models in electrophysiological research, underscoring the need for models integrating mechanical and electrical dynamics to improve the translational relevance of ischemic studies.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 330(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California System (US), Lung Institute (US), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.