Role of 3D-CISS sequence in differentiating cerebellopontine meningiomas from schwannomas

PurposeDifferentiating cerebellopontine meningioma (CPM) from schwannoma (CPS) can be challenging. In this location, schwannomas alter the composition of the perilymphatic fluid differently from meningiomas, which has repercussions on magnetic resonance imaging. This study aims to distinguish between these tumors based on the labyrinthine fluid signal on 3D-CISS.MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed CPM and CPS were selected. Analyses were performed considering visual signal intensity from the vestibule and cochlea, and the signal ratios between the vestibules (aV/uV) and the cochleae (aC/uC) on affected and unaffected sides. The signal intensity ratio between vestibule and cerebellum (aV/aCH), vestibule and cerebrospinal fluid (aV/aCSF), and cochlea and cerebrospinal fluid (aC/aCSF), on affected sides, as well as the vestibule and cerebellum ratio between affected and unaffected sides ([aV/aCH]: [uV/uCH]), were also compared.ResultsStatistically significant differences were demonstrated for visual signal reduction (<i>p</i> < .001) and for aV/uV (<i>p</i> = .005), aC/uC (<i>p</i> < .001), [aV/aCH]: [uV/uCH] (<i>p</i> = .018), aV/aCSF (<i>p</i> = .036), and aC/aCSF (<i>p</i> = .001) ratios, with lower values associated with schwannomas. The aC/aCSF ratio showed the highest accuracy (84.2%), with a cutoff value of 0.63, and the second-largest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (0.791). The visual reduction of cochlear signal showed the second-highest accuracy (83%). The aC/uC ratio demonstrated the largest area under the ROC curve (0.857) and the third-highest accuracy (75.5%), using 0.74 as the cutoff value.ConclusionThe visual reduction of cochlear signal and the aC/uC and aC/aCSF ratios proved to be the most effective parameters for distinguishing CPM from CPS when the labyrinthine fluid is utilized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Neuroradiology Journal
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251393209
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of 3D-CISS sequence in differentiating cerebellopontine meningiomas from schwannomas

Nina Ventura, Rodrigo da Silva Mourão, Diogo Goulart Corrêa
The Neuroradiology Journal
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Role of 3D-CISS sequence in differentiating cerebellopontine meningiomas from schwannomas

Nina Ventura, Rodrigo da Silva Mourão, Diogo Goulart Corrêa
article en

Abstract

PurposeDifferentiating cerebellopontine meningioma (CPM) from schwannoma (CPS) can be challenging. In this location, schwannomas alter the composition of the perilymphatic fluid differently from meningiomas, which has repercussions on magnetic resonance imaging. This study aims to distinguish between these tumors based on the labyrinthine fluid signal on 3D-CISS.MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed CPM and CPS were selected. Analyses were performed considering visual signal intensity from the vestibule and cochlea, and the signal ratios between the vestibules (aV/uV) and the cochleae (aC/uC) on affected and unaffected sides. The signal intensity ratio between vestibule and cerebellum (aV/aCH), vestibule and cerebrospinal fluid (aV/aCSF), and cochlea and cerebrospinal fluid (aC/aCSF), on affected sides, as well as the vestibule and cerebellum ratio between affected and unaffected sides ([aV/aCH]: [uV/uCH]), were also compared.ResultsStatistically significant differences were demonstrated for visual signal reduction (<i>p</i> < .001) and for aV/uV (<i>p</i> = .005), aC/uC (<i>p</i> < .001), [aV/aCH]: [uV/uCH] (<i>p</i> = .018), aV/aCSF (<i>p</i> = .036), and aC/aCSF (<i>p</i> = .001) ratios, with lower values associated with schwannomas. The aC/aCSF ratio showed the highest accuracy (84.2%), with a cutoff value of 0.63, and the second-largest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (0.791). The visual reduction of cochlear signal showed the second-highest accuracy (83%). The aC/uC ratio demonstrated the largest area under the ROC curve (0.857) and the third-highest accuracy (75.5%), using 0.74 as the cutoff value.ConclusionThe visual reduction of cochlear signal and the aC/uC and aC/aCSF ratios proved to be the most effective parameters for distinguishing CPM from CPS when the labyrinthine fluid is utilized.

The Neuroradiology Journal
Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro (BR), Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (BR), Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.