The nexus between labor share and income inequality: theory and evidence from the U.S

Abstract This paper develops a theoretical framework to explain observed trends in the labor share, income inequality, and their nexus. Our model, incorporating capital-skill complementarity and capital-biased technological progress, accounts for the evolution of factor and personal income distributions in the U.S. along two dimensions of decomposition: by skill level (high-skilled and low-skilled) and income source (labor and capital income). Our findings reveal that between-skill inequality is the primary channel linking labor share dynamics to income inequality. Beyond the overall decline in labor share, rising between-skill inequality contributes to the divergence in labor income shares between high-skilled and low-skilled workers, while also driving labor income inequality to increase in parallel with aggregate inequality. The share of labor is therefore negatively correlated with income inequality. The model shows empirical consistency, indicating that our theory captures key structural forces driving the dynamics of the factor and personal income distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Economic Papers
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaf028
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The nexus between labor share and income inequality: theory and evidence from the U.S

Chun-Hung Kuo, Juin‐jen Chang, Kun-Ying Lei, Chia-Ying Liu
Oxford Economic Papers
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

The nexus between labor share and income inequality: theory and evidence from the U.S

Chun-Hung Kuo, Juin‐jen Chang, Kun-Ying Lei, Chia-Ying Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper develops a theoretical framework to explain observed trends in the labor share, income inequality, and their nexus. Our model, incorporating capital-skill complementarity and capital-biased technological progress, accounts for the evolution of factor and personal income distributions in the U.S. along two dimensions of decomposition: by skill level (high-skilled and low-skilled) and income source (labor and capital income). Our findings reveal that between-skill inequality is the primary channel linking labor share dynamics to income inequality. Beyond the overall decline in labor share, rising between-skill inequality contributes to the divergence in labor income shares between high-skilled and low-skilled workers, while also driving labor income inequality to increase in parallel with aggregate inequality. The share of labor is therefore negatively correlated with income inequality. The model shows empirical consistency, indicating that our theory captures key structural forces driving the dynamics of the factor and personal income distributions.

Oxford Economic PapersVol. 78(1)
Aletheia University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.