Finite Element and Parametric Study on the Shear Capacity of FRP and Stainless-Steel Bolted Connectors in GFRP–Concrete Composite Beams

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are increasingly utilized in civil engineering due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and environmental sustainability compared to steel. Shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams are critical for effective load transfer, yet their behavior under static loads remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the shear strength, stiffness, and failure modes of GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless-steel shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams through a comprehensive parametric analysis, addressing gaps in material optimization, bolt configuration, and design guidelines. A validated finite element model in Abaqus was employed to simulate push-out tests based on experimental data. The parameters analyzed included shear connector material (GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless steel), bolt diameter (16–30 mm), number of bolts (1–6), longitudinal spacing (60–120 mm), embedment length (40–70 mm), and concrete compressive strength (30–70 MPa). Shear load–slip (P-S) curves, ultimate shear load (P), secant stiffness (K1), and failure modes were evaluated. CFRP bolts exhibited the highest shear capacity, 26.50% greater than stainless steel, with failure dominated by flange bearing, like AFRP and stainless steel, while GFRP bolts failed by shear failure of bolt shanks. Shear capacity increased by 90.60%, with bolt diameter from 16 mm to 30 mm, shifting failure from bolt shank to concrete splitting. Multi-bolt configurations reduced per-bolt shear capacity by up to 15.00% due to uneven load distribution. Larger bolt spacing improved per-bolt shear capacity by 9.48% from 60 mm (3d) to 120 mm (6d). However, in beams, larger spacing reduced the total number of bolts, decreasing overall shear resistance and the degree of shear connection. Higher embedment lengths (he/d ≥ 3.0) mitigated pry-out failure, with shear capacity increasing by 33.59% from 40 mm to 70 mm embedment. Increasing concrete strength from 30 MPa to 70 MPa enhanced shear capacity by 22.07%, shifting the failure mode from concrete splitting to bolt shank shear. The study highlights the critical influence of bolt material, diameter, number, spacing, embedment length, and concrete strength on shear behavior. These findings support the development of FRP-specific design models, enhancing the reliability and sustainability of FRP–concrete hybrid systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9110622
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite Element and Parametric Study on the Shear Capacity of FRP and Stainless-Steel Bolted Connectors in GFRP–Concrete Composite Beams

Ahmed F. Zidan, Hesham Shaaban, Ayman El‐Zohairy
Journal of Composites Science
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Finite Element and Parametric Study on the Shear Capacity of FRP and Stainless-Steel Bolted Connectors in GFRP–Concrete Composite Beams

Ahmed F. Zidan, Hesham Shaaban, Ayman El‐Zohairy
article en

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are increasingly utilized in civil engineering due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and environmental sustainability compared to steel. Shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams are critical for effective load transfer, yet their behavior under static loads remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the shear strength, stiffness, and failure modes of GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless-steel shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams through a comprehensive parametric analysis, addressing gaps in material optimization, bolt configuration, and design guidelines. A validated finite element model in Abaqus was employed to simulate push-out tests based on experimental data. The parameters analyzed included shear connector material (GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless steel), bolt diameter (16–30 mm), number of bolts (1–6), longitudinal spacing (60–120 mm), embedment length (40–70 mm), and concrete compressive strength (30–70 MPa). Shear load–slip (P-S) curves, ultimate shear load (P), secant stiffness (K1), and failure modes were evaluated. CFRP bolts exhibited the highest shear capacity, 26.50% greater than stainless steel, with failure dominated by flange bearing, like AFRP and stainless steel, while GFRP bolts failed by shear failure of bolt shanks. Shear capacity increased by 90.60%, with bolt diameter from 16 mm to 30 mm, shifting failure from bolt shank to concrete splitting. Multi-bolt configurations reduced per-bolt shear capacity by up to 15.00% due to uneven load distribution. Larger bolt spacing improved per-bolt shear capacity by 9.48% from 60 mm (3d) to 120 mm (6d). However, in beams, larger spacing reduced the total number of bolts, decreasing overall shear resistance and the degree of shear connection. Higher embedment lengths (he/d ≥ 3.0) mitigated pry-out failure, with shear capacity increasing by 33.59% from 40 mm to 70 mm embedment. Increasing concrete strength from 30 MPa to 70 MPa enhanced shear capacity by 22.07%, shifting the failure mode from concrete splitting to bolt shank shear. The study highlights the critical influence of bolt material, diameter, number, spacing, embedment length, and concrete strength on shear behavior. These findings support the development of FRP-specific design models, enhancing the reliability and sustainability of FRP–concrete hybrid systems.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 9(11)
Zagazig University (EG), East Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.