Dynamic differential privacy technique for deep learning models

Deep learning is a field within artificial intelligence that uses large datasets to train models capable of recognizing patterns and making predictions. One of the serious challenges facing model creators during data training is preserving the privacy of the data. Adversaries use membership inference attack to expose the privacy of the data used in training the model. They identify whether a specific data point was used in the training process or not. To protect these models against this type of attack, differential privacy approach can be used. Differential privacy involves adding noise to the training weights during the data training phase according to a specific probability distribution. At every step during the data training process, a fixed amount of noise is consistently added to the training weights. This paper utilizes a modified version of the differential privacy technique to defend against membership inference attacks. The new algorithm does not add regular noise to the training weights in each step but it adds it randomly during training process. Adding noise randomly increases the randomness in training phase and decrease the chances of prediction in the case of an attack. The model performance is evaluated using a set of metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the privacy budget (ε). The results demonstrate that the Gaussian Randomized Noise Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (Gaussian RanN-DP-SGD) approach consistently outperforms other standard Differential Privacy (DP) methods across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Regarding privacy preservation, the Gaussian RanN-DP-SGD method achieves the most favorable privacy-utility trade-off, maintaining a satisfactory balance between model utility and user privacy. Notably, it delivers acceptable performance within a privacy budget range of [Formula: see text], which is suitable for most practical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27708-0
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic differential privacy technique for deep learning models

Emad Elabd
Scientific Reports
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Dynamic differential privacy technique for deep learning models

Emad Elabd
article en

Abstract

Deep learning is a field within artificial intelligence that uses large datasets to train models capable of recognizing patterns and making predictions. One of the serious challenges facing model creators during data training is preserving the privacy of the data. Adversaries use membership inference attack to expose the privacy of the data used in training the model. They identify whether a specific data point was used in the training process or not. To protect these models against this type of attack, differential privacy approach can be used. Differential privacy involves adding noise to the training weights during the data training phase according to a specific probability distribution. At every step during the data training process, a fixed amount of noise is consistently added to the training weights. This paper utilizes a modified version of the differential privacy technique to defend against membership inference attacks. The new algorithm does not add regular noise to the training weights in each step but it adds it randomly during training process. Adding noise randomly increases the randomness in training phase and decrease the chances of prediction in the case of an attack. The model performance is evaluated using a set of metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the privacy budget (ε). The results demonstrate that the Gaussian Randomized Noise Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (Gaussian RanN-DP-SGD) approach consistently outperforms other standard Differential Privacy (DP) methods across accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Regarding privacy preservation, the Gaussian RanN-DP-SGD method achieves the most favorable privacy-utility trade-off, maintaining a satisfactory balance between model utility and user privacy. Notably, it delivers acceptable performance within a privacy budget range of [Formula: see text], which is suitable for most practical applications.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Qassim University (SA), Menoufia University (EG)
Qassim University
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.