Introduction

Archives of film and media are being challenged, critiqued, and reimagined. The heritage that has been preserved and the knowledge production to which it contributes has typically reinforced systemic structural barriers and inequalities and privileged dominant histories, identities, and communities, whilst sidelining and marginalising others (Cade; Gaines; Gledhill and Knight; Hagener and Zimmermann; Sawadogo). But a paradigm shift is taking place. Film and media history is in flux and being reframed through, for example, women’s film history (Ball et al.; Bell, Movie Workers; Galt; Gledhill and Knight; Hennefeld and Horak), queer history (Anselmo; Damiens; McKinney) Black film history (Cade; McLeod Cramer; Posner and Cifor), African film history (Mano et al.), object-centred approaches (Fenwick; Hastie; Stead), memory studies and oral history (Bell, ‘“I”’; Biltereyst et al.; Cobb and Williams; Kuhn), museology and media archaeology (Cere; Hall and Ellis; Huhtamo and Galili; Lameris), ethnography and early film history (Groo; Ingravalle; Porter), decolonisation (Cere et al.), and filmmaking and performance (El Hassan; Dust & Metal; Siewert).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alphaville Journal of Film and Screen Media
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.2930.12
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Danilo Giglitto, Rinella Cere, James Fenwick
Alphaville Journal of Film and Screen Media
Cinema and Media Studies
article

Introduction

Danilo Giglitto, Rinella Cere, James Fenwick
article en

Abstract

Archives of film and media are being challenged, critiqued, and reimagined. The heritage that has been preserved and the knowledge production to which it contributes has typically reinforced systemic structural barriers and inequalities and privileged dominant histories, identities, and communities, whilst sidelining and marginalising others (Cade; Gaines; Gledhill and Knight; Hagener and Zimmermann; Sawadogo). But a paradigm shift is taking place. Film and media history is in flux and being reframed through, for example, women’s film history (Ball et al.; Bell, Movie Workers; Galt; Gledhill and Knight; Hennefeld and Horak), queer history (Anselmo; Damiens; McKinney) Black film history (Cade; McLeod Cramer; Posner and Cifor), African film history (Mano et al.), object-centred approaches (Fenwick; Hastie; Stead), memory studies and oral history (Bell, ‘“I”’; Biltereyst et al.; Cobb and Williams; Kuhn), museology and media archaeology (Cere; Hall and Ellis; Huhtamo and Galili; Lameris), ethnography and early film history (Groo; Ingravalle; Porter), decolonisation (Cere et al.), and filmmaking and performance (El Hassan; Dust & Metal; Siewert).

Alphaville Journal of Film and Screen Media(29-30)
University of Manchester (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.