AI systems should be trustworthy, not trusted

Abstract Scientific and public debates on the ethical aspects of AI development and deployment often end up focusing on trust in AI systems, rather than on their trustworthiness. This paper argues that actual trust should not be the focus of the debate in AI ethics or the goal of the responsible design, deployment, and assessment of AI systems. The argument will insist on three distinct—although interrelated—points. First, I will argue that trust is a complex psychological phenomenon that is influenced by many contextual and non-rational factors that may have little to do with AI systems’ actual trustworthiness. Then, I will show that some widely employed strategies to foster trust in AI are ethically questionable and hardly compatible with the trustworthy AI paradigm. Finally, I will focus on the fact that trust might lead to unmonitored reliance on systems whose risks are not negligible and, in many cases, largely unknown.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02728-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI systems should be trustworthy, not trusted

Giacomo Zanotti
1 citations
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

AI systems should be trustworthy, not trusted

Giacomo Zanotti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Scientific and public debates on the ethical aspects of AI development and deployment often end up focusing on trust in AI systems, rather than on their trustworthiness. This paper argues that actual trust should not be the focus of the debate in AI ethics or the goal of the responsible design, deployment, and assessment of AI systems. The argument will insist on three distinct—although interrelated—points. First, I will argue that trust is a complex psychological phenomenon that is influenced by many contextual and non-rational factors that may have little to do with AI systems’ actual trustworthiness. Then, I will show that some widely employed strategies to foster trust in AI are ethically questionable and hardly compatible with the trustworthy AI paradigm. Finally, I will focus on the fact that trust might lead to unmonitored reliance on systems whose risks are not negligible and, in many cases, largely unknown.

AI & Society
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.