From principles to practice: user inclusion in responsible innovation for digital healthcare

This paper explores how Responsible Innovation (RI) is enacted at the firm level in the digital healthcare sector, with a focus on user inclusion. While RI has gained traction, its practical implementation within firms remains under-theorised. Drawing on a relational approach, this study examines how sociomaterial and spatiotemporal dynamics shape user inclusion in an early-stage digital health startup. Through a longitudinal qualitative field study, we identify key barriers and enablers of inclusion, including material agency and implicit social norms. Our findings extend RI frameworks by showing that inclusion is not merely procedural or normative, but a situated practice shaped by interactions between human and non-human actors. This study contributes to both RI theory and organisational practice by offering a grounded understanding of how user inclusion unfolds in real-world innovation contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2025.2576949
Primary Topic
Service and Product Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From principles to practice: user inclusion in responsible innovation for digital healthcare

Z. Othman, Linnea Tavakoli Hagström
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Service and Product Innovation
article

From principles to practice: user inclusion in responsible innovation for digital healthcare

Z. Othman, Linnea Tavakoli Hagström
article en

Abstract

This paper explores how Responsible Innovation (RI) is enacted at the firm level in the digital healthcare sector, with a focus on user inclusion. While RI has gained traction, its practical implementation within firms remains under-theorised. Drawing on a relational approach, this study examines how sociomaterial and spatiotemporal dynamics shape user inclusion in an early-stage digital health startup. Through a longitudinal qualitative field study, we identify key barriers and enablers of inclusion, including material agency and implicit social norms. Our findings extend RI frameworks by showing that inclusion is not merely procedural or normative, but a situated practice shaped by interactions between human and non-human actors. This study contributes to both RI theory and organisational practice by offering a grounded understanding of how user inclusion unfolds in real-world innovation contexts.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 12(1)
Mälardalen University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Service and Product Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.