Numerical investigation of bonding in stone-clad Façades: comparative analysis with and without mechanical anchorage

Abstract Reliable simulation of bond behavior between stone façade panels and concrete substrates is crucial for safe façade design, particularly with mechanical anchorage. Conventional finite element models relying on tie constraints overestimate interface strength, especially in the absence of surface preparation or bonding agents. This study develops and validates a physically motivated, element deletion–based finite element methodology to accurately simulate crack initiation, propagation, and failure at the mortar–stone interface. The three-dimensional numerical models, implemented in ABAQUS and benchmarked against laboratory splitting shear tests, represent the composite system comprising a concrete substrate, sand-cement adhesive mortar, and a Travertine stone façade. Both unanchored and Z-type mechanically anchored configurations were examined. Results demonstrate the approach yields accurate predictions of failure loads and damage evolution: for unanchored specimens, the maximum numerical–experimental deviation was below 2%, while Z-type clip anchorage significantly enhanced the load-bearing capacity and altered the fracture mechanism. Compared to conventional tie or interface-layer models, the element deletion strategy provides a computationally efficient and transparent tool for capturing the failure behavior of stone–mortar–concrete composites. The findings offer insights for optimizing façade anchorage design and provide a validated numerical framework for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-025-00157-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical investigation of bonding in stone-clad Façades: comparative analysis with and without mechanical anchorage

Farhood Shahidi, Seyed Ali Emamian, Majid Movahedi Rad, Vahid Shafaie et al.
3 citations
Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
2.86
article

Numerical investigation of bonding in stone-clad Façades: comparative analysis with and without mechanical anchorage

Farhood Shahidi, Seyed Ali Emamian, Majid Movahedi Rad, Vahid Shafaie, Oveys Ghodousian
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Reliable simulation of bond behavior between stone façade panels and concrete substrates is crucial for safe façade design, particularly with mechanical anchorage. Conventional finite element models relying on tie constraints overestimate interface strength, especially in the absence of surface preparation or bonding agents. This study develops and validates a physically motivated, element deletion–based finite element methodology to accurately simulate crack initiation, propagation, and failure at the mortar–stone interface. The three-dimensional numerical models, implemented in ABAQUS and benchmarked against laboratory splitting shear tests, represent the composite system comprising a concrete substrate, sand-cement adhesive mortar, and a Travertine stone façade. Both unanchored and Z-type mechanically anchored configurations were examined. Results demonstrate the approach yields accurate predictions of failure loads and damage evolution: for unanchored specimens, the maximum numerical–experimental deviation was below 2%, while Z-type clip anchorage significantly enhanced the load-bearing capacity and altered the fracture mechanism. Compared to conventional tie or interface-layer models, the element deletion strategy provides a computationally efficient and transparent tool for capturing the failure behavior of stone–mortar–concrete composites. The findings offer insights for optimizing façade anchorage design and provide a validated numerical framework for future research.

Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and ResilienceVol. 6(1)
Qazvin Islamic Azad University (IR), Takestan Islamic Azad University (IR), Université Laval (CA), Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.