S1201 Disparities in Healthcare and Utilization Between Cisgender versus Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex, biopsychosocial disorder of brain-gut interaction, comprising 20-30% of outpatient GI referrals. These patients utilize healthcare at greater rates, increasing costs and the risk of over-testing. Transgender and gender non-conforming patients (TGNC) are an underserved population with higher rates of chronic conditions, psychiatric illness, and healthcare utilization, where their connection to IBS has yet to be identified, especially regarding hormonal changes. This study explores disparities in medical services and utilization between cisgender and TGNC patients with IBS. Methods: Using the TriNetX research database (accessed 12/2024), 2 cohorts of IBS patients were created using International Classification of Diseases codes for those with gender dysphoria and without. Demographic and rates of general comorbidities were obtained, and cohorts were matched by age and race. Outcomes included colonic surgery, endoscopy, inpatient and emergency visits, and prescriptions for anti-diarrheal, anti-constipation, or adjunctive medicines (e.g., anti-spasmodics, mirtazapine, or tricyclics). Results: This study identified 1,154,340 cisgender and 3,861 TGNC IBS patients. After matching, each group included 3,832 patients. TGNC patients were generally younger and more likely to be male, white, or Hispanic. They had greater comorbidities (except cardiovascular) compared to cisgender patients, who were more likely to be female, Black, or Asian. There was no difference in surgery rates or medication use. However, TGNC patients had more inpatient (17.7% vs 13.4%) and emergency encounters (31.5% vs 28.0%), while having fewer endoscopies (10.4% vs 13.2%). Conclusion: This research demonstrates significant differences in age and race between cohorts. Limitations in database classification obscure how they classify sex or gender for transgender patients, though the higher proportion of males in the TGNC group suggests more transmen with IBS than expected (despite transwomen begin more common overall), and more women assigned male at birth. As IBS is more prevalent in cisgender women, this raises questions about hormonal influences in disease development. TGNC patients had greater healthcare utilization but underwent fewer endoscopies, potentially reflecting underuse, discrimination, or differing symptom presentations. These findings highlight the need for further research into sex-gender differences in IBS and disparities in healthcare for TGNC patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132264.02630.79
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1201 Disparities in Healthcare and Utilization Between Cisgender versus Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Andrew Suchan, Lynn Kobeissi
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1201 Disparities in Healthcare and Utilization Between Cisgender versus Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Andrew Suchan, Lynn Kobeissi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex, biopsychosocial disorder of brain-gut interaction, comprising 20-30% of outpatient GI referrals. These patients utilize healthcare at greater rates, increasing costs and the risk of over-testing. Transgender and gender non-conforming patients (TGNC) are an underserved population with higher rates of chronic conditions, psychiatric illness, and healthcare utilization, where their connection to IBS has yet to be identified, especially regarding hormonal changes. This study explores disparities in medical services and utilization between cisgender and TGNC patients with IBS. Methods: Using the TriNetX research database (accessed 12/2024), 2 cohorts of IBS patients were created using International Classification of Diseases codes for those with gender dysphoria and without. Demographic and rates of general comorbidities were obtained, and cohorts were matched by age and race. Outcomes included colonic surgery, endoscopy, inpatient and emergency visits, and prescriptions for anti-diarrheal, anti-constipation, or adjunctive medicines (e.g., anti-spasmodics, mirtazapine, or tricyclics). Results: This study identified 1,154,340 cisgender and 3,861 TGNC IBS patients. After matching, each group included 3,832 patients. TGNC patients were generally younger and more likely to be male, white, or Hispanic. They had greater comorbidities (except cardiovascular) compared to cisgender patients, who were more likely to be female, Black, or Asian. There was no difference in surgery rates or medication use. However, TGNC patients had more inpatient (17.7% vs 13.4%) and emergency encounters (31.5% vs 28.0%), while having fewer endoscopies (10.4% vs 13.2%). Conclusion: This research demonstrates significant differences in age and race between cohorts. Limitations in database classification obscure how they classify sex or gender for transgender patients, though the higher proportion of males in the TGNC group suggests more transmen with IBS than expected (despite transwomen begin more common overall), and more women assigned male at birth. As IBS is more prevalent in cisgender women, this raises questions about hormonal influences in disease development. TGNC patients had greater healthcare utilization but underwent fewer endoscopies, potentially reflecting underuse, discrimination, or differing symptom presentations. These findings highlight the need for further research into sex-gender differences in IBS and disparities in healthcare for TGNC patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.