S1077 Contemporary Frequency of Non-Erosive Reflux Disease in Symptomatic Patients

Introduction: Heartburn affects nearly 20% of individuals in the United States. When left untreated, chronic heartburn due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can lead to esophageal mucosal injury, classified as erosive reflux disease (ERD). However, with the widespread availability and use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over the past few decades, such presentations have become less common. Increasingly, many patients with reflux symptoms exhibit no visible mucosal damage on endoscopy—a presentation known as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). This study aims to characterize the contemporary prevalence of NERD among symptomatic patients. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single-center, institutional review board-approved study that included patients undergoing an upper endoscopy (EGD) to evaluate heartburn between February 2024 and May 2025. Demographics and body mass index (BMI) were collected through chart review. Participants were divided into 2 groups: those with NERD, and those with erosive disease (ERD) or Barrett’s esophagus. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, 2-sample t tests and Chi-square analyses. Results: A total of 90 patients were included. Of these, 78% (71/90) had normal esophageal mucosa consistent with NERD. Los Angeles (LA) grade A and B esophagitis were identified in 10% (9/90) and 6% (5/90) of patients, respectively. LA grade C and D esophagitis were identified in 3% (3/90) of and 0% (0/90) of patients, respectively. Barrett’s esophagus or short-segment Barrett’s was found in 2% (2/90). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or BMI between groups. Conclusion: In this prospective study, the majority (78%) of patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation for heartburn had no visible esophageal mucosal injury, consistent with NERD. These findings highlight NERD as the predominant presentation of GERD in current day clinical practice—a critical distinction, as its management is quite different from ERD, and focuses on symptom relief rather than mucosal healing. These results underscore the high prevalence of NERD in the current clinical environment and support the need for further research into therapies for this group of patients. The authors would like to disclose the use of ChatGPT to improve language and readability of this abstract.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131768.89150.99
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1077 Contemporary Frequency of Non-Erosive Reflux Disease in Symptomatic Patients

Venkatraman Srinivasan, Eric D. Shah, Katie Liu, Bhavana Tetali et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

S1077 Contemporary Frequency of Non-Erosive Reflux Disease in Symptomatic Patients

Venkatraman Srinivasan, Eric D. Shah, Katie Liu, Bhavana Tetali, Charlotte Larson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heartburn affects nearly 20% of individuals in the United States. When left untreated, chronic heartburn due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can lead to esophageal mucosal injury, classified as erosive reflux disease (ERD). However, with the widespread availability and use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over the past few decades, such presentations have become less common. Increasingly, many patients with reflux symptoms exhibit no visible mucosal damage on endoscopy—a presentation known as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). This study aims to characterize the contemporary prevalence of NERD among symptomatic patients. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, single-center, institutional review board-approved study that included patients undergoing an upper endoscopy (EGD) to evaluate heartburn between February 2024 and May 2025. Demographics and body mass index (BMI) were collected through chart review. Participants were divided into 2 groups: those with NERD, and those with erosive disease (ERD) or Barrett’s esophagus. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, 2-sample t tests and Chi-square analyses. Results: A total of 90 patients were included. Of these, 78% (71/90) had normal esophageal mucosa consistent with NERD. Los Angeles (LA) grade A and B esophagitis were identified in 10% (9/90) and 6% (5/90) of patients, respectively. LA grade C and D esophagitis were identified in 3% (3/90) of and 0% (0/90) of patients, respectively. Barrett’s esophagus or short-segment Barrett’s was found in 2% (2/90). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or BMI between groups. Conclusion: In this prospective study, the majority (78%) of patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation for heartburn had no visible esophageal mucosal injury, consistent with NERD. These findings highlight NERD as the predominant presentation of GERD in current day clinical practice—a critical distinction, as its management is quite different from ERD, and focuses on symptom relief rather than mucosal healing. These results underscore the high prevalence of NERD in the current clinical environment and support the need for further research into therapies for this group of patients. The authors would like to disclose the use of ChatGPT to improve language and readability of this abstract.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.