S1184 Comparative Effectiveness of Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Rifaximin for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Symptom Relief and Quality of Life

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) significantly impairs quality of life and lacks universally effective treatment. Although both dietary and pharmacologic therapies are widely used, comparative efficacy data remain limited, particularly for symptom control and patient-centered outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-carbohydrate dietary interventions—including low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) and Mediterranean diets—versus rifaximin in reducing IBS symptom burden and improving quality of life (QOL). Methods: This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,289) comparing dietary therapies or rifaximin to control or standard care. Primary outcomes were changes in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL). Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD), mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (RR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated via I². Subgroup analyses stratified by IBS subtype and intervention duration were conducted. Results: Low FODMAP Diet: Significantly reduced IBS-SSS compared to standard advice (SMD –0.83; 95% CI: –1.20 to –0.46; I² = 58%). Mediterranean Diet: Associated with the highest improvement in IBS-QOL (MD +14.0; 95% CI: 6.7 to 21.3). Rifaximin: Demonstrated symptom relief (RR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.65) with a favorable safety profile. Subgroup Trends: Greater efficacy was observed in IBS-D and with interventions lasting >8 weeks. Adverse Events: Minimal and comparable across interventions. Conclusion: Low-carbohydrate dietary approaches, particularly low FODMAP and Mediterranean diets, are as effective as rifaximin in improving both symptoms and quality of life in IBS. Given their safety, accessibility, and sustained patient-reported benefits, dietary interventions should be prioritized in IBS management pathways. These findings support guideline-level consideration of structured nutrition therapy in functional GI disorders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132196.23512.84
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1184 Comparative Effectiveness of Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Rifaximin for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Symptom Relief and Quality of Life

Rishika Trivedi, Prince Shah-Riar, Asif Zamir, Nisha Bhowmick et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1184 Comparative Effectiveness of Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Rifaximin for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Symptom Relief and Quality of Life

Rishika Trivedi, Prince Shah-Riar, Asif Zamir, Nisha Bhowmick, Khalifa Augi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) significantly impairs quality of life and lacks universally effective treatment. Although both dietary and pharmacologic therapies are widely used, comparative efficacy data remain limited, particularly for symptom control and patient-centered outcomes. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of low-carbohydrate dietary interventions—including low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) and Mediterranean diets—versus rifaximin in reducing IBS symptom burden and improving quality of life (QOL). Methods: This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,289) comparing dietary therapies or rifaximin to control or standard care. Primary outcomes were changes in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL). Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD), mean differences (MD), and risk ratios (RR) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated via I². Subgroup analyses stratified by IBS subtype and intervention duration were conducted. Results: Low FODMAP Diet: Significantly reduced IBS-SSS compared to standard advice (SMD –0.83; 95% CI: –1.20 to –0.46; I² = 58%). Mediterranean Diet: Associated with the highest improvement in IBS-QOL (MD +14.0; 95% CI: 6.7 to 21.3). Rifaximin: Demonstrated symptom relief (RR 1.32; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.65) with a favorable safety profile. Subgroup Trends: Greater efficacy was observed in IBS-D and with interventions lasting >8 weeks. Adverse Events: Minimal and comparable across interventions. Conclusion: Low-carbohydrate dietary approaches, particularly low FODMAP and Mediterranean diets, are as effective as rifaximin in improving both symptoms and quality of life in IBS. Given their safety, accessibility, and sustained patient-reported benefits, dietary interventions should be prioritized in IBS management pathways. These findings support guideline-level consideration of structured nutrition therapy in functional GI disorders.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.