S1200 Symptom Overlap Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gynecologic Conditions: A Missed Diagnostic Opportunity

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been diagnosed in approximately 5%-7% of the US population, with women disproportionately affected. Its nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, such as bloating, abdominal discomfort, and altered bowel habits, overlap with those of gynecologic conditions like fibroids and endometriosis, increasing the risk of a missed diagnosis. While endometriosis has been linked to higher IBS prevalence, the association with fibroids remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess whether women diagnosed with IBS are more likely to carry a concurrent diagnosis of fibroids or endometriosis, to evaluate the potential for missed gynecologic diagnoses in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database to compare the prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis in women with and without a diagnosis of IBS. We identified women diagnosed with IBS (n = 11,625), fibroids (n = 15,189), and endometriosis (n = 5,508). Prevalence rates of fibroids and endometriosis were compared between those with and without IBS. Pearson chi-square tests were used to calculate odds ratios and assess statistical significance. Results: The odds ratio for fibroids in women with IBS versus those without was 3.05 (95% CI: 2.89–3.21, P < 0.001); for endometriosis, the odds ratio was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.94–5.68, P < 0.001). Additionally, we analyzed diagnosis timing to determine whether IBS diagnosis typically precedes fibroids diagnosis and found no significant difference. Conclusion: Our findings reveal a strong association between IBS and gynecologic conditions such as fibroids and endometriosis, raising concern for missed or delayed diagnoses in women presenting with nonspecific GI symptoms. In those with concurrent diagnoses, the data did not suggest that IBS was diagnosed more frequently before fibroids. While overlapping mechanisms like visceral hypersensitivity may explain some comorbidity with endometriosis, this mechanism would not explain the correlation with fibroids. IBS patients accumulate significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization and a misdiagnosis may lead to prolonged symptom burden, unnecessary GI testing, delayed gynecologic treatment, repeated provider visits, ineffective treatment plans and suboptimal patient outcomes. Even as GI guidelines promote a positive diagnosis of IBS, our findings suggest that providers should consider concurrent gynecologic conditions in female IBS patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132260.99578.19
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1200 Symptom Overlap Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gynecologic Conditions: A Missed Diagnostic Opportunity

William McGonigle, Karen Walton, Ami Panara Shukla
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1200 Symptom Overlap Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gynecologic Conditions: A Missed Diagnostic Opportunity

William McGonigle, Karen Walton, Ami Panara Shukla
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been diagnosed in approximately 5%-7% of the US population, with women disproportionately affected. Its nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms, such as bloating, abdominal discomfort, and altered bowel habits, overlap with those of gynecologic conditions like fibroids and endometriosis, increasing the risk of a missed diagnosis. While endometriosis has been linked to higher IBS prevalence, the association with fibroids remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess whether women diagnosed with IBS are more likely to carry a concurrent diagnosis of fibroids or endometriosis, to evaluate the potential for missed gynecologic diagnoses in this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the National Institutes of Health All of Us database to compare the prevalence of fibroids and endometriosis in women with and without a diagnosis of IBS. We identified women diagnosed with IBS (n = 11,625), fibroids (n = 15,189), and endometriosis (n = 5,508). Prevalence rates of fibroids and endometriosis were compared between those with and without IBS. Pearson chi-square tests were used to calculate odds ratios and assess statistical significance. Results: The odds ratio for fibroids in women with IBS versus those without was 3.05 (95% CI: 2.89–3.21, P < 0.001); for endometriosis, the odds ratio was 5.30 (95% CI: 4.94–5.68, P < 0.001). Additionally, we analyzed diagnosis timing to determine whether IBS diagnosis typically precedes fibroids diagnosis and found no significant difference. Conclusion: Our findings reveal a strong association between IBS and gynecologic conditions such as fibroids and endometriosis, raising concern for missed or delayed diagnoses in women presenting with nonspecific GI symptoms. In those with concurrent diagnoses, the data did not suggest that IBS was diagnosed more frequently before fibroids. While overlapping mechanisms like visceral hypersensitivity may explain some comorbidity with endometriosis, this mechanism would not explain the correlation with fibroids. IBS patients accumulate significantly higher healthcare costs and utilization and a misdiagnosis may lead to prolonged symptom burden, unnecessary GI testing, delayed gynecologic treatment, repeated provider visits, ineffective treatment plans and suboptimal patient outcomes. Even as GI guidelines promote a positive diagnosis of IBS, our findings suggest that providers should consider concurrent gynecologic conditions in female IBS patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.