Four million COVID-19 cases in four European cross-border regions reveal minimal cross-border transmission effect on domestic burden: space-time cluster analysis

Restrictions of cross-border mobility were used during the COVID-19 pandemic to slow down transmission between countries. Such restrictions came with significant societal costs, and their effect on in-country burdens of COVID-19 has been questioned. Our study aims to assess whether cross-border transmission contributed significantly to in-country burdens of COVID-19 in four large Euroregions shared by the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Geographical information systems (GIS) and Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) models were used to visualize the spatial distribution of COVID-19 cases from January 2020 through October 2022. Space-time cluster analysis with SaTScan was used to identify significant clusters of COVID-19 cases and determine whether they included cross-border areas. Over 4 million cases drawn from the national infectious disease registries were analysed for this study. Incidence of COVID-19 increased and decreased independently within each country, except for one simultaneous peak in January 2022 due to the Omicron variant. Eight significant space-time clusters were identified, four of which were cross-border clusters. All eight clusters occurred during periods of high in-country transmission. Our findings showed that cross-border transmission did not contribute in significant ways to in-country burdens of COVID-19 burden in the regions studied. The identified clusters corresponded to in-country waves of infection. Our results challenge the assumption that border closures were crucial in controlling the pandemic and highlight the need for coordinated public health responses that balance the effect of interventions with societal costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11959-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four million COVID-19 cases in four European cross-border regions reveal minimal cross-border transmission effect on domestic burden: space-time cluster analysis

Boris Kauhl, Volker Hackert, Christian J. P. A. Hoebe, Brigitte van der Zanden
1 citations
BMC Infectious Diseases
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
article

Four million COVID-19 cases in four European cross-border regions reveal minimal cross-border transmission effect on domestic burden: space-time cluster analysis

Boris Kauhl, Volker Hackert, Christian J. P. A. Hoebe, Brigitte van der Zanden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Restrictions of cross-border mobility were used during the COVID-19 pandemic to slow down transmission between countries. Such restrictions came with significant societal costs, and their effect on in-country burdens of COVID-19 has been questioned. Our study aims to assess whether cross-border transmission contributed significantly to in-country burdens of COVID-19 in four large Euroregions shared by the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Geographical information systems (GIS) and Besag-York-Mollie (BYM) models were used to visualize the spatial distribution of COVID-19 cases from January 2020 through October 2022. Space-time cluster analysis with SaTScan was used to identify significant clusters of COVID-19 cases and determine whether they included cross-border areas. Over 4 million cases drawn from the national infectious disease registries were analysed for this study. Incidence of COVID-19 increased and decreased independently within each country, except for one simultaneous peak in January 2022 due to the Omicron variant. Eight significant space-time clusters were identified, four of which were cross-border clusters. All eight clusters occurred during periods of high in-country transmission. Our findings showed that cross-border transmission did not contribute in significant ways to in-country burdens of COVID-19 burden in the regions studied. The identified clusters corresponded to in-country waves of infection. Our results challenge the assumption that border closures were crucial in controlling the pandemic and highlight the need for coordinated public health responses that balance the effect of interventions with societal costs.

BMC Infectious DiseasesVol. 25(1)
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Independent Sector (US), Maastricht University (NL), Department of Health (TW), De Wever-Ziekenhuis (NL), GGD Zuid Limburg (NL), 's Heeren Loo (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.