Teachers’ continuing professional development: using student evaluations to start a dialogue

Student evaluations of teaching (SET) is typically used to monitor educational quality. However, SET can also support teachers in their continuing professional development (CPD) by offering them insights into their performance as well as their learning needs. However, little is known about how teachers use and engage with SET as to shape their CPD and improve their teaching. To explore how feedback in SET informs teachers' CPD, four semi-structured focus groups with teachers (N = 24) in Higher Education were conducted and analysed thematically, using feedback literacy as an analytical lens. Results of the present study show that SET is used to inform teachers' CPD, especially informal learning. Informal learning activities included participants engaging in dialogues with different stakeholders, such as students, peers and colleagues, and their supervisor. These feedback dialogues had different purposes, such as making sense of the feedback, judging the feedback, but also to learn from the feedback. Judging feedback in SET depends on various factors, such as the experience and role of the teacher, the seniority of students, and whether the feedback was repeated. It is therefore recommended that higher educational institutions provide teachers with opportunities to discuss the feedback they received in SET, such as during peer-to-peer coaching sessions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2584136
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teachers’ continuing professional development: using student evaluations to start a dialogue

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans, Carolin Sehlbach, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Niels van der Baan et al.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Teachers’ continuing professional development: using student evaluations to start a dialogue

Diana H. J. M. Dolmans, Carolin Sehlbach, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Niels van der Baan, Thomas Hennemann
article en

Abstract

Student evaluations of teaching (SET) is typically used to monitor educational quality. However, SET can also support teachers in their continuing professional development (CPD) by offering them insights into their performance as well as their learning needs. However, little is known about how teachers use and engage with SET as to shape their CPD and improve their teaching. To explore how feedback in SET informs teachers' CPD, four semi-structured focus groups with teachers (N = 24) in Higher Education were conducted and analysed thematically, using feedback literacy as an analytical lens. Results of the present study show that SET is used to inform teachers' CPD, especially informal learning. Informal learning activities included participants engaging in dialogues with different stakeholders, such as students, peers and colleagues, and their supervisor. These feedback dialogues had different purposes, such as making sense of the feedback, judging the feedback, but also to learn from the feedback. Judging feedback in SET depends on various factors, such as the experience and role of the teacher, the seniority of students, and whether the feedback was repeated. It is therefore recommended that higher educational institutions provide teachers with opportunities to discuss the feedback they received in SET, such as during peer-to-peer coaching sessions.

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher EducationVol. 51(2)
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Department of Health (TW), Department of Education (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.