Higher Circulating IL-6 levels as a predictor for poor outcome after migraine preventive treatment: a prospective study

Clinical and preclinical evidence suggests an association between higher levels of IL-6 and migraine. The present study aimed to determine whether pretreatment serum IL-6 levels were associated with headache outcomes at month 3 following migraine preventive treatment. In this prospective study, newly diagnosed migraine patients without current or recent use of preventive medications within 3 months were recruited, and were dichotomized as having higher or lower IL-6 serum levels according to the median at baseline among all of the patients who started preventive treatment with flunarizine. Primary and secondary outcomes were the mean change from baseline in the number of monthly headache days (MHDs) at month 3 based on headache diaries, and the percentage of non-responders, i.e., patients without ≥ 50% MHD reduction at month 3 compared to baseline, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between higher IL-6 levels and treatment non-response, which were further controlled for demographics, headache profiles, disability (measured by Migraine Disability Assessment), psychiatric comorbidities (measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and sleep quality (measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). In total, 236 migraine patients (187 F/49 M, mean age ± standard deviation 37.1 ± 10.3 years) were analyzed. At baseline, the median IL-6 level was 0.79 pg/mL, and a higher IL-6 level was associated with an older age (mean age 39.5 ± 10.6 vs. 34.6 ± 9.5 years, p < 0.001) and female sex (85.6% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.016), and a trend toward more MHDs (17.1 ± 8.1 vs. 15.0 ± 8.1 days/month, p = 0.050). After preventive treatment, patients with higher baseline IL-6 levels had less improvement in headache frequency (-5.7 vs. -8.2 MHDs, p = 0.004), and were more likely to be non-responders (72.0% vs. 44.9%, p < 0.001) (adjusted OR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.61–5.25, p < 0.001). The results were consistent in sensitivity analysis across different subgroups. There was an independent association between higher pretreatment IL-6 levels and poorer response to preventive treatment with flunarizine at month 3 in this large cohort of migraine patients. Whether this finding could be generalizable to other preventives and whether such patients could benefit from preventives of immunomodulatory properties need to be further explored. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02747940, NCT04702971.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02200-2
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Higher Circulating IL-6 levels as a predictor for poor outcome after migraine preventive treatment: a prospective study

Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Kuan‐Lin Lai, Yi‐Shiang Tzeng, Li‐Ling Hope Pan et al.
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

Higher Circulating IL-6 levels as a predictor for poor outcome after migraine preventive treatment: a prospective study

Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Kuan‐Lin Lai, Yi‐Shiang Tzeng, Li‐Ling Hope Pan, Hung‐Yu Liu, Yu‐Hsiang Ling, Shih‐Pin Chen, Yen‐Feng Wang, Wei‐Ta Chen
article en

Abstract

Clinical and preclinical evidence suggests an association between higher levels of IL-6 and migraine. The present study aimed to determine whether pretreatment serum IL-6 levels were associated with headache outcomes at month 3 following migraine preventive treatment. In this prospective study, newly diagnosed migraine patients without current or recent use of preventive medications within 3 months were recruited, and were dichotomized as having higher or lower IL-6 serum levels according to the median at baseline among all of the patients who started preventive treatment with flunarizine. Primary and secondary outcomes were the mean change from baseline in the number of monthly headache days (MHDs) at month 3 based on headache diaries, and the percentage of non-responders, i.e., patients without ≥ 50% MHD reduction at month 3 compared to baseline, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between higher IL-6 levels and treatment non-response, which were further controlled for demographics, headache profiles, disability (measured by Migraine Disability Assessment), psychiatric comorbidities (measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and sleep quality (measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). In total, 236 migraine patients (187 F/49 M, mean age ± standard deviation 37.1 ± 10.3 years) were analyzed. At baseline, the median IL-6 level was 0.79 pg/mL, and a higher IL-6 level was associated with an older age (mean age 39.5 ± 10.6 vs. 34.6 ± 9.5 years, p < 0.001) and female sex (85.6% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.016), and a trend toward more MHDs (17.1 ± 8.1 vs. 15.0 ± 8.1 days/month, p = 0.050). After preventive treatment, patients with higher baseline IL-6 levels had less improvement in headache frequency (-5.7 vs. -8.2 MHDs, p = 0.004), and were more likely to be non-responders (72.0% vs. 44.9%, p < 0.001) (adjusted OR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.61–5.25, p < 0.001). The results were consistent in sensitivity analysis across different subgroups. There was an independent association between higher pretreatment IL-6 levels and poorer response to preventive treatment with flunarizine at month 3 in this large cohort of migraine patients. Whether this finding could be generalizable to other preventives and whether such patients could benefit from preventives of immunomodulatory properties need to be further explored. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02747940, NCT04702971.

The Journal of Headache and PainVol. 26(1)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW), Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.