Mechanistic Descriptions and Kinetic Trends in CO <sub>2</sub> Hydrogenation on Ru, Co, and Ni Nanoparticles

Dispersed Ru, Co, and Ni nanoparticles are the preferred catalysts for converting the CO2–H2 reactants to CO and CH4. This study shows that they exhibit similar kinetic effects of CO2, H2, and CO pressures on the CO2 conversion turnover rates and CH4 selectivities, reflecting the common identity and kinetic relevance of the elementary steps and intermediates on all three metals. CO2 conversion proceeds via quasi-equilibrated direct dissociation into chemisorbed CO (CO*) and O* and the kinetically-relevant H-assisted removal of O*. CH4 forms through H-assisted activation of CO*, which binds strongly on all three metals, leading to high CO* coverages and strong inhibition of both CO and CH4 formation rates. CO adsorption–desorption remains quasi-equilibrated, with the fluid-phase CO pressure set by the relative rates of CO formation and conversion at each axial position along the catalyst bed. The rate equations derived from these elementary steps, embedded within convection-reaction mole balances that account for axial CO concentration gradients, accurately describe measured rates and selectivities on Ru, Co, and Ni catalysts over broad and practical ranges of temperature (483–573 K), pressure (4–1400 kPa CO2, 2–700 kPa H2), support (SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2), and nanoparticle size (1–30 nm mean diameter). The similar functional form of these rate equations shows that these most competent metals for CO2–H2 reactions are less mechanistically diverse than typically considered in the search for more active or selective catalysts through compositional or structural complexity. The proposed elementary steps shown to describe the CO2–H2 reaction rates and selectivities on Ru, Co, and Ni nanoparticles provide a robust mechanistic framework that avoids ad hoc mechanistic proposals tailored to specific catalyst compositions, structures, or reaction conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Catalysis
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5c04970
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic Descriptions and Kinetic Trends in CO 2 Hydrogenation on Ru, Co, and Ni Nanoparticles

Gregory L. Tate, Wenshuo Hu, Enrique Iglesia
4 citations
ACS Catalysis
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
article

Mechanistic Descriptions and Kinetic Trends in CO 2 Hydrogenation on Ru, Co, and Ni Nanoparticles

Gregory L. Tate, Wenshuo Hu, Enrique Iglesia
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Dispersed Ru, Co, and Ni nanoparticles are the preferred catalysts for converting the CO2–H2 reactants to CO and CH4. This study shows that they exhibit similar kinetic effects of CO2, H2, and CO pressures on the CO2 conversion turnover rates and CH4 selectivities, reflecting the common identity and kinetic relevance of the elementary steps and intermediates on all three metals. CO2 conversion proceeds via quasi-equilibrated direct dissociation into chemisorbed CO (CO*) and O* and the kinetically-relevant H-assisted removal of O*. CH4 forms through H-assisted activation of CO*, which binds strongly on all three metals, leading to high CO* coverages and strong inhibition of both CO and CH4 formation rates. CO adsorption–desorption remains quasi-equilibrated, with the fluid-phase CO pressure set by the relative rates of CO formation and conversion at each axial position along the catalyst bed. The rate equations derived from these elementary steps, embedded within convection-reaction mole balances that account for axial CO concentration gradients, accurately describe measured rates and selectivities on Ru, Co, and Ni catalysts over broad and practical ranges of temperature (483–573 K), pressure (4–1400 kPa CO2, 2–700 kPa H2), support (SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2), and nanoparticle size (1–30 nm mean diameter). The similar functional form of these rate equations shows that these most competent metals for CO2–H2 reactions are less mechanistically diverse than typically considered in the search for more active or selective catalysts through compositional or structural complexity. The proposed elementary steps shown to describe the CO2–H2 reaction rates and selectivities on Ru, Co, and Ni nanoparticles provide a robust mechanistic framework that avoids ad hoc mechanistic proposals tailored to specific catalyst compositions, structures, or reaction conditions.

ACS CatalysisVol. 15(22)
Davidson College (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.