Turning plastic and biomass waste into adsorbents: CO2/CH4 separation and comparison with commercial carbons

This work compares two commercial activated carbons (CC1 and CC2) with a novel lab-scale activated carbon (NC) produced from the co-pyrolysis of post-consumer plastic waste and olive cake, followed by physical activation with CO<sub>2</sub>. The materials were characterized by elemental analysis, proximate analysis, surface area measurements, XRD, and XPS. Elemental and proximate analyses revealed that CC2 possesses the highest carbon content (95.25 %), nitrogen doping (1.62 %), and lowest ash fraction (0.82 %). Textural analysis indicated that CC2 exhibits a high BET surface area (948.55 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and micropore area (780.84 m<sup>2</sup>/g), while CC1 showed a negligible surface area (2.82 m<sup>2</sup>/g), and NC demonstrated a moderate surface area (230.04 m<sup>2</sup>/g), indicating a poorly developed porous structure in both cases. Dynamic adsorption tests showed that CC2 presented the highest CO<sub>2</sub> uptake (up to 2.90 mmol/g) and CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> selectivity (2.40 in molar terms under biogas conditions), mainly attributed to its well-developed microporosity that favor physisorption. In contrast, NC showed lower CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption (0.80 mmol/g) and higher CH<sub>4</sub> uptake (0.93 mmol/g), resulting in poor selectivity (0.96), suggesting the need for further modification, such as surface functionalization or chemical activation. CC1, limited by its almost non-existent porosity, exhibited intermediate performance with comparable CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> uptakes (0.95 and 0.92 mmol/g, respectively) and modest selectivity (1.04), likely influenced by minor chemisorption on mineral impurities. Despite its lower CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity and selectivity, NC demonstrates high regeneration efficiency, making it suitable for repeated use in gas separation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115223
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turning plastic and biomass waste into adsorbents: CO2/CH4 separation and comparison with commercial carbons

M. Calero, G. Blázquez, Ledicia Pereira, María Ángeles Martín-Lara et al.
2 citations
Waste Management
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
1.63
article

Turning plastic and biomass waste into adsorbents: CO2/CH4 separation and comparison with commercial carbons

M. Calero, G. Blázquez, Ledicia Pereira, María Ángeles Martín-Lara, Antera Martel Quintana, Mario J. Muñoz‐Batista
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work compares two commercial activated carbons (CC1 and CC2) with a novel lab-scale activated carbon (NC) produced from the co-pyrolysis of post-consumer plastic waste and olive cake, followed by physical activation with CO<sub>2</sub>. The materials were characterized by elemental analysis, proximate analysis, surface area measurements, XRD, and XPS. Elemental and proximate analyses revealed that CC2 possesses the highest carbon content (95.25 %), nitrogen doping (1.62 %), and lowest ash fraction (0.82 %). Textural analysis indicated that CC2 exhibits a high BET surface area (948.55 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and micropore area (780.84 m<sup>2</sup>/g), while CC1 showed a negligible surface area (2.82 m<sup>2</sup>/g), and NC demonstrated a moderate surface area (230.04 m<sup>2</sup>/g), indicating a poorly developed porous structure in both cases. Dynamic adsorption tests showed that CC2 presented the highest CO<sub>2</sub> uptake (up to 2.90 mmol/g) and CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> selectivity (2.40 in molar terms under biogas conditions), mainly attributed to its well-developed microporosity that favor physisorption. In contrast, NC showed lower CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption (0.80 mmol/g) and higher CH<sub>4</sub> uptake (0.93 mmol/g), resulting in poor selectivity (0.96), suggesting the need for further modification, such as surface functionalization or chemical activation. CC1, limited by its almost non-existent porosity, exhibited intermediate performance with comparable CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> uptakes (0.95 and 0.92 mmol/g, respectively) and modest selectivity (1.04), likely influenced by minor chemisorption on mineral impurities. Despite its lower CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity and selectivity, NC demonstrates high regeneration efficiency, making it suitable for repeated use in gas separation.

Waste ManagementVol. 210
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.