Learning reduces ingroup bias more with perceived losses than gains across cultures

Cultural background shapes intergroup impressions. While previous evidence suggests collectivistic cultures show stronger ingroup bias, cultural effects on impression formation processes remain unexplored. Here, we used reinforcement learning models to examine changes in intergroup impressions within gain and loss frames across individualistic (Western) and collectivistic (East Asian) cultures. Participants interacted with ingroup or outgroup individuals who increased (Gain) or decreased (Loss) their earnings, with identical net outcomes. Impression ratings were taken pre- and post-interaction. Results revealed higher ingroup identification in East Asians and initial ingroup bias in both cultures. Westerners learned to reduce this initial ingroup bias based on a learning signal (negative prediction error) generated if an ingroup individual reduced their earnings (i.e., Loss frame). East Asians showed the same learning mechanism, but only with low ingroup identification. Together, we show that learning from negatively perceived ingroup interactions can decrease ingroup bias across cultures, modulated by individual ingroup identification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00362-x
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning reduces ingroup bias more with perceived losses than gains across cultures

Grit Hein, Shihui Han, Pyungwon Kang, Björn Lindström et al.
npj Science of Learning
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Learning reduces ingroup bias more with perceived losses than gains across cultures

Grit Hein, Shihui Han, Pyungwon Kang, Björn Lindström, Alexander Soutschek, Philippe N. Tobler, Yuqing Zhou
article en

Abstract

Cultural background shapes intergroup impressions. While previous evidence suggests collectivistic cultures show stronger ingroup bias, cultural effects on impression formation processes remain unexplored. Here, we used reinforcement learning models to examine changes in intergroup impressions within gain and loss frames across individualistic (Western) and collectivistic (East Asian) cultures. Participants interacted with ingroup or outgroup individuals who increased (Gain) or decreased (Loss) their earnings, with identical net outcomes. Impression ratings were taken pre- and post-interaction. Results revealed higher ingroup identification in East Asians and initial ingroup bias in both cultures. Westerners learned to reduce this initial ingroup bias based on a learning signal (negative prediction error) generated if an ingroup individual reduced their earnings (i.e., Loss frame). East Asians showed the same learning mechanism, but only with low ingroup identification. Together, we show that learning from negatively perceived ingroup interactions can decrease ingroup bias across cultures, modulated by individual ingroup identification.

npj Science of LearningVol. 10(1)
McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US), University of Zurich (CH), University of Würzburg (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Chinese Institute for Brain Research (CN), Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (CH), Social Neuroscience Lab (DE), Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Process Engineering (CN), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.