Changes in Agricultural Soil Quality and Production Capacity Associated with Severe Flood Events in the Sava River Basin

Intensifying urbanization in Central Europe is increasingly pushing flood retention areas onto private farmland, yet the agronomic and socio-economic trade-offs remain poorly quantified. We conducted a narrative review of published field data and post-event assessments from 2014–2023 along the transboundary Sava River. Information was collected from research articles, case studies, and environmental monitoring reports, and synthesized in relation to national and EU regulatory thresholds to evaluate how floods altered soil functions and agricultural viability. Water erosion during floods stripped up to 30 cm of topsoil in torrential reaches, while stagnant inundation deposited 5–50 cm of sediments enriched with potentially toxic elements, occasionally causing food crops to exceed EU contaminant limits due to uptake from the soil. Flood sediments also introduced persistent organic pollutants: 13 modern pesticides were detected post-flood in soils, with several exceeding sediment quality guidelines. Waterlogging reduced maize, pumpkin, and forage yields by half where soil remained submerged for more than three days, with farm income falling by approximately 50% in the most affected areas. These impacts contrast with limited public awareness of long-term soil degradation, raising questions about the appropriateness of placing additional dry retention reservoirs—an example of nature-based solutions—on agricultural land. We argue that equitable flood-risk governance in the Sava River Basin requires: (i) a trans-boundary soil quality monitoring network linking agronomic, hydrological, and contaminant datasets; (ii) compensation schemes for agricultural landowners that account for both immediate crop losses and delayed remediation costs; and (iii) integration of strict farmland protection clauses into spatial planning, favoring compact, greener cities over lateral river expansion. Such measures would balance societal flood-safety gains with the long-term productivity and food security functions of agricultural land.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112216
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Agricultural Soil Quality and Production Capacity Associated with Severe Flood Events in the Sava River Basin

Vesna Zupanc, Aleksa Lipovac, Ružica Stričević, Rozalija Cvejić et al.
Land
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Changes in Agricultural Soil Quality and Production Capacity Associated with Severe Flood Events in the Sava River Basin

Vesna Zupanc, Aleksa Lipovac, Ružica Stričević, Rozalija Cvejić, Tihomir Predić, Nejc Golob
article en

Abstract

Intensifying urbanization in Central Europe is increasingly pushing flood retention areas onto private farmland, yet the agronomic and socio-economic trade-offs remain poorly quantified. We conducted a narrative review of published field data and post-event assessments from 2014–2023 along the transboundary Sava River. Information was collected from research articles, case studies, and environmental monitoring reports, and synthesized in relation to national and EU regulatory thresholds to evaluate how floods altered soil functions and agricultural viability. Water erosion during floods stripped up to 30 cm of topsoil in torrential reaches, while stagnant inundation deposited 5–50 cm of sediments enriched with potentially toxic elements, occasionally causing food crops to exceed EU contaminant limits due to uptake from the soil. Flood sediments also introduced persistent organic pollutants: 13 modern pesticides were detected post-flood in soils, with several exceeding sediment quality guidelines. Waterlogging reduced maize, pumpkin, and forage yields by half where soil remained submerged for more than three days, with farm income falling by approximately 50% in the most affected areas. These impacts contrast with limited public awareness of long-term soil degradation, raising questions about the appropriateness of placing additional dry retention reservoirs—an example of nature-based solutions—on agricultural land. We argue that equitable flood-risk governance in the Sava River Basin requires: (i) a trans-boundary soil quality monitoring network linking agronomic, hydrological, and contaminant datasets; (ii) compensation schemes for agricultural landowners that account for both immediate crop losses and delayed remediation costs; and (iii) integration of strict farmland protection clauses into spatial planning, favoring compact, greener cities over lateral river expansion. Such measures would balance societal flood-safety gains with the long-term productivity and food security functions of agricultural land.

LandVol. 14(11)
University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Belgrade (RS), Public Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska (BA), University clinical center of Republika Srpska (BA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.