Clinical Relevance and Follow-Up of Incidental CT Imaging Findings for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings in thoracic computed tomography (CT) performed because of COVID-19 and their potential impact on patient management. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective analysis included 683 CT scans from 327 patients who underwent CT imaging of the thorax with or without the application of intravenous contrast-agents because of the primary indication of COVID-19. Radiological findings were categorized according to the COVID-19 Pneumonia Imaging Classification by four independent readers. Incidental findings were categorized according to a scale ranging from 0 (no patient impairment) to 3b (severe permanent impairment). <b>Results</b>: In the 683 CT-scans, typical COVID-19 findings were present in 273 scans (40.0%), atypical signs in 97 (14.2%), indeterminate findings in 40 (5.9%), and no signs of COVID-19 in 273 (40.0%). Incidental findings were reported in 94 out of 683 cases (13.8%), of which 63 (67.0%) were classified as category 0, 12 (12.8%) as category 1, 9 (9.6%) as category 2a, none (0.0%) as category 2b, 5 (5.3%) as category 3a, and 5 (5.3%) as category 3b. <b>Conclusions</b>: CT scans of the thorax for COVID-19 show a small but significant number of incidental findings that require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222832
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Relevance and Follow-Up of Incidental CT Imaging Findings for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analysis

Jonas Kroschke, Thomas Frauenfelder, Frederik Abel, Marie-Hélène Marty et al.
Diagnostics
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Clinical Relevance and Follow-Up of Incidental CT Imaging Findings for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Retrospective Analysis

Jonas Kroschke, Thomas Frauenfelder, Frederik Abel, Marie-Hélène Marty, Sabine Franckenberg, Bjarne Kerber
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of incidental findings in thoracic computed tomography (CT) performed because of COVID-19 and their potential impact on patient management. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective analysis included 683 CT scans from 327 patients who underwent CT imaging of the thorax with or without the application of intravenous contrast-agents because of the primary indication of COVID-19. Radiological findings were categorized according to the COVID-19 Pneumonia Imaging Classification by four independent readers. Incidental findings were categorized according to a scale ranging from 0 (no patient impairment) to 3b (severe permanent impairment). <b>Results</b>: In the 683 CT-scans, typical COVID-19 findings were present in 273 scans (40.0%), atypical signs in 97 (14.2%), indeterminate findings in 40 (5.9%), and no signs of COVID-19 in 273 (40.0%). Incidental findings were reported in 94 out of 683 cases (13.8%), of which 63 (67.0%) were classified as category 0, 12 (12.8%) as category 1, 9 (9.6%) as category 2a, none (0.0%) as category 2b, 5 (5.3%) as category 3a, and 5 (5.3%) as category 3b. <b>Conclusions</b>: CT scans of the thorax for COVID-19 show a small but significant number of incidental findings that require further investigation.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(22)
University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.