Mapping Urban Environmental Quality in Isfahan: A Scenario-Driven Framework for Decision Support

Urban managers and decision-makers may approach Urban Environmental Quality (UEQ) assessment with perspectives that range from highly pessimistic to highly optimistic scenarios. The objective of this study was to introduce a scenario-driven spatial decision support system framework for optimizing UEQ zoning. The proposed framework includes six steps: (1) building a geodatabase of criteria, (2) standardizing criteria using minimum and maximum methods, (3) determining criteria weights using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, (4) combining criteria and creating scenarios using the OWA method, (5) analyzing UEQ maps with statistical analyses, and (6) examining variability through histogram analysis of UEQ values across scenarios. The results indicate that, among environmental and infrastructural criteria, air pollution and population density had the most significant impact on UEQ zoning in Isfahan city. In the five decision-making scenarios (highly pessimistic, pessimistic, neutral, optimistic, and highly optimistic), 8% (19), 12% (15), 16% (12), 21% (8), and 25% (5) of Isfahan’s area were classified as poor, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the population in poor classes across the scenarios was 5% (14), 10% (11), 13% (7), 17% (5), and 20% (3), respectively. The findings demonstrate that the proposed framework offers high flexibility and capability for assessing UEQ across different decision-making scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14112213
Primary Topic
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Urban Environmental Quality in Isfahan: A Scenario-Driven Framework for Decision Support

Mohammad Karimi Firozjaei, Dagmar Haase, Majid Javid, Saeideh Esmaili et al.
Land
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
article

Mapping Urban Environmental Quality in Isfahan: A Scenario-Driven Framework for Decision Support

Mohammad Karimi Firozjaei, Dagmar Haase, Majid Javid, Saeideh Esmaili, Amir Sedighi, Zahra Taheri
article en

Abstract

Urban managers and decision-makers may approach Urban Environmental Quality (UEQ) assessment with perspectives that range from highly pessimistic to highly optimistic scenarios. The objective of this study was to introduce a scenario-driven spatial decision support system framework for optimizing UEQ zoning. The proposed framework includes six steps: (1) building a geodatabase of criteria, (2) standardizing criteria using minimum and maximum methods, (3) determining criteria weights using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, (4) combining criteria and creating scenarios using the OWA method, (5) analyzing UEQ maps with statistical analyses, and (6) examining variability through histogram analysis of UEQ values across scenarios. The results indicate that, among environmental and infrastructural criteria, air pollution and population density had the most significant impact on UEQ zoning in Isfahan city. In the five decision-making scenarios (highly pessimistic, pessimistic, neutral, optimistic, and highly optimistic), 8% (19), 12% (15), 16% (12), 21% (8), and 25% (5) of Isfahan’s area were classified as poor, respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the population in poor classes across the scenarios was 5% (14), 10% (11), 13% (7), 17% (5), and 20% (3), respectively. The findings demonstrate that the proposed framework offers high flexibility and capability for assessing UEQ across different decision-making scenarios.

LandVol. 14(11)
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Tehran (IR), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.