The nature of a park – managing complexity and unpredictability for the long term

Global challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss increase demands on urban green infrastructure (GI) to provide increasingly wide ranges of functions and services. Academia, policy and practice call for long-term perspectives to ensure the sustainability of GI and address solutions by adopting approaches inspired by nature. Meanwhile, current trends in contracted out park management entail attention to economic and technical aspects, overlooking long-term GI development. The interface between long-term ambitions and short-term operational GI practice is addressed through the case of a planned park in Täby municipality, Sweden. The case represents an ambition to integrate design, construction and management of high biodiversity GI through a ‘design-by-management’ approach, resting on ideas of continuous and adaptive vegetation development after the initial construction. Workshops were conducted with responsible stakeholders in project management, park management and nature management, providing insight into current contexts and future demands of GI establishment and management. Results reveal differences in contract management approaches depending on landscape typology – namely, ‘parks’ and ‘nature’. Project and park managers work with an approach based on adherence to rigid formal documents where dynamics and uncertainty are understood as liabilities. Conversely, nature managers work with strategic development goals as a foundation for a joint view with responsible contractors. The case suggests that existing organizational practices in park construction and maintenance make it difficult to fully embrace the complexity and uncertainty of the intended processes. However, introducing GI management in early design phases offers valuable opportunities to address these challenges strategically, supporting long term sustainability. • Park maintenance regimes are currently challenged by contradictory demands. • Hardscape logics turns unpredictability into a liability in park maintenance. • Nature-based designs need to acknowledge their context in a management regime. • Inclusion of management in early design stages is pivotal for systemic integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2025-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129170
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The nature of a park – managing complexity and unpredictability for the long term

Anna Sunding, Nicola Dempsey
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
article

The nature of a park – managing complexity and unpredictability for the long term

Anna Sunding, Nicola Dempsey
article en

Abstract

Global challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss increase demands on urban green infrastructure (GI) to provide increasingly wide ranges of functions and services. Academia, policy and practice call for long-term perspectives to ensure the sustainability of GI and address solutions by adopting approaches inspired by nature. Meanwhile, current trends in contracted out park management entail attention to economic and technical aspects, overlooking long-term GI development. The interface between long-term ambitions and short-term operational GI practice is addressed through the case of a planned park in Täby municipality, Sweden. The case represents an ambition to integrate design, construction and management of high biodiversity GI through a ‘design-by-management’ approach, resting on ideas of continuous and adaptive vegetation development after the initial construction. Workshops were conducted with responsible stakeholders in project management, park management and nature management, providing insight into current contexts and future demands of GI establishment and management. Results reveal differences in contract management approaches depending on landscape typology – namely, ‘parks’ and ‘nature’. Project and park managers work with an approach based on adherence to rigid formal documents where dynamics and uncertainty are understood as liabilities. Conversely, nature managers work with strategic development goals as a foundation for a joint view with responsible contractors. The case suggests that existing organizational practices in park construction and maintenance make it difficult to fully embrace the complexity and uncertainty of the intended processes. However, introducing GI management in early design phases offers valuable opportunities to address these challenges strategically, supporting long term sustainability. • Park maintenance regimes are currently challenged by contradictory demands. • Hardscape logics turns unpredictability into a liability in park maintenance. • Nature-based designs need to acknowledge their context in a management regime. • Inclusion of management in early design stages is pivotal for systemic integration.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 114
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.