Bio-inspired decision making in robot swarms under biases

Abstract To operate autonomously, minimal robot swarms must make timely and reliable collective decisions despite noisy individual sensing and severe constraints on communication, computation, and memory. Achieving this capability could expand their use in applications such as healthcare, disaster response, and environmental monitoring. Here, we study how such swarms can rapidly and reliably reach consensus on the best among n discrete options by comparing two canonical mechanisms of opinion dynamics—direct-switch and cross-inhibition—simple yet effective rules for collective information processing observed in biological systems across scales, from neural populations to insect colonies. We generalise existing mean-field models by incorporating asocial biases that influence opinion dynamics. While swarms using direct-switch reliably select the best option in the absence of asocial dynamics, their performance deteriorates when such biases are introduced, often leading to decision deadlocks. In contrast, bio-inspired cross-inhibition enables faster, more cohesive, robust, and scalable decisions across a wide range of biased conditions. Our findings provide theoretical and practical insights into the coordination of minimal swarms, with implications for a broad class of decentralised decision-making systems across biology and engineering.