Avoidance of Systemic Anticoagulation During Hemodialysis with Hydrolink Membrane and Citrate-Dialysate: A Single-Center Observational Study

Background: In hemodialysis (HD), avoiding anticoagulation is preferable in patients at increased risk of bleeding but may be challenging due to the risk of circuit clotting. The use of NV-U® (Hydrolink™) membrane, or citrate-based dialysate, has been shown to reduce the risk of circuit thrombosis. However, the combined use of both strategies has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of this combination for conducting anticoagulation - free HD sessions in patients at bleeding risk, and to identify risk factors associated with circuit thrombosis. Methods: It was a single-center, observational, retrospective and prospective study conducted between January 2020 and April 2025. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing dialysis without therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation were included, for up to 3 sessions each. Heparin-free dialysis was performed at the clinician’s discretion and retrospectively assessed using the Lohr and Swartz scale. Clinical, biological and dialysis-session data were collected. The primary endpoint was completion of the prescribed dialysis time, without circuit thrombosis or additional intervention. Secondary endpoint was the identification of thrombosis risk factors. Results: A total of 54 patients were included (97 sessions). The prescribed dialysis time was achieved without intervention in 86.6% of cases. Average session duration was 191.6 minutes, with an average blood flow of 339 mL/min. The success rate was 100% for sessions <150 min, 90.6% between 150-<210 min, and 81.1% beyond 210 min. For sessions longer than 210 min, we observed an average Kt/V online of 1.48. No patient characteristics demonstrated a statistically significant association with the occurrence of thrombosis. Among the dialysis-related parameters, only activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) differed significantly between sessions with and without circuit failure. Conclusion: The combined use of the NV-U membrane and citrate dialysate appears to be a feasible and effective strategy for performing anticoagulation-free HD in patients at risk of bleeding. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.20255bshvdve
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avoidance of Systemic Anticoagulation During Hemodialysis with Hydrolink Membrane and Citrate-Dialysate: A Single-Center Observational Study

J. Laouni, Caroline La, Thomas Baudoux, Alaín Le Moine et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Avoidance of Systemic Anticoagulation During Hemodialysis with Hydrolink Membrane and Citrate-Dialysate: A Single-Center Observational Study

J. Laouni, Caroline La, Thomas Baudoux, Alaín Le Moine, Hassane Njimi, Maryam Erraji Chahid
article en

Abstract

Background: In hemodialysis (HD), avoiding anticoagulation is preferable in patients at increased risk of bleeding but may be challenging due to the risk of circuit clotting. The use of NV-U® (Hydrolink™) membrane, or citrate-based dialysate, has been shown to reduce the risk of circuit thrombosis. However, the combined use of both strategies has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of this combination for conducting anticoagulation - free HD sessions in patients at bleeding risk, and to identify risk factors associated with circuit thrombosis. Methods: It was a single-center, observational, retrospective and prospective study conducted between January 2020 and April 2025. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing dialysis without therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation were included, for up to 3 sessions each. Heparin-free dialysis was performed at the clinician’s discretion and retrospectively assessed using the Lohr and Swartz scale. Clinical, biological and dialysis-session data were collected. The primary endpoint was completion of the prescribed dialysis time, without circuit thrombosis or additional intervention. Secondary endpoint was the identification of thrombosis risk factors. Results: A total of 54 patients were included (97 sessions). The prescribed dialysis time was achieved without intervention in 86.6% of cases. Average session duration was 191.6 minutes, with an average blood flow of 339 mL/min. The success rate was 100% for sessions <150 min, 90.6% between 150-<210 min, and 81.1% beyond 210 min. For sessions longer than 210 min, we observed an average Kt/V online of 1.48. No patient characteristics demonstrated a statistically significant association with the occurrence of thrombosis. Among the dialysis-related parameters, only activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) differed significantly between sessions with and without circuit failure. Conclusion: The combined use of the NV-U membrane and citrate dialysate appears to be a feasible and effective strategy for performing anticoagulation-free HD in patients at risk of bleeding. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Erasmus Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.