Comparative Kidney and Clinical Outcomes in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance vs. Other Glomerulopathies: Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a rare and heterogeneous cause of glomerular disease, associated with distinct risks from both its hematologic and renal components. However, real-world comparative outcome data for MGRS versus other primary glomerulopathies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate renal and clinical outcomes in MGRS compared to other glomerular diseases using a large, multi-institutional electronic health record network. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the TriNetX Global Network. MGRS patients were identified by the presence of both monoclonal gammopathy and glomerular disease diagnosis codes. The comparator cohort included patients with glomerulopathy ICD codes but no monoclonal gammopathy. In both groups, individuals with diabetic nephropathy, hereditary nephropathy, or lupus nephritis were excluded. Each MGRS patient was 1:1 propensity score–matched to a control with another primary glomerulopathy using demographics, baseline kidney function, comorbidities, and diagnosis year. Covariate balance was confirmed. Outcomes were compared using standardized analytic methods. Results: The matched analysis included 1,236 patients per group. There were no significant differences in acute kidney injury (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p=0.753), new dialysis initiation (1.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.812), CKD stage 4/5 (6.6% vs. 5.7%, p=0.456), or progression to dialysis (1.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.812). MGRS patients had higher rates of pneumonia (17.5% vs. 12.8%, p=0.003), blood transfusion (10.8% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001), neutropenia (9.3% vs. 3.3%, p<0.001), and CRP ≥30 mg/L (mean 4.7 vs. 2.6, p=0.005). No differences were observed in cardiac arrest (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p=0.872), septic shock (0.6% vs. 0.6%, p=0.987), hospitalization (37.1% vs. 33.6%, p=0.098), outpatient visits (mean 4.97 vs. 3.39, p=0.313), or all-cause mortality (5.9% vs. 5.0%, p=0.388). Conclusion: In this large, matched real-world study, MGRS was associated with higher risks of infection, cytopenia, transfusion, and inflammation compared to other glomerulopathies, while rates of renal progression and mortality were similar. These findings support enhanced supportive care strategies in MGRS management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025hj0b95d8
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Kidney and Clinical Outcomes in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance vs. Other Glomerulopathies: Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis

Brian Singeltary, Farhan Khan, Guido M Capriles
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Comparative Kidney and Clinical Outcomes in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance vs. Other Glomerulopathies: Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis

Brian Singeltary, Farhan Khan, Guido M Capriles
article en

Abstract

Background: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a rare and heterogeneous cause of glomerular disease, associated with distinct risks from both its hematologic and renal components. However, real-world comparative outcome data for MGRS versus other primary glomerulopathies are lacking. We aimed to evaluate renal and clinical outcomes in MGRS compared to other glomerular diseases using a large, multi-institutional electronic health record network. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the TriNetX Global Network. MGRS patients were identified by the presence of both monoclonal gammopathy and glomerular disease diagnosis codes. The comparator cohort included patients with glomerulopathy ICD codes but no monoclonal gammopathy. In both groups, individuals with diabetic nephropathy, hereditary nephropathy, or lupus nephritis were excluded. Each MGRS patient was 1:1 propensity score–matched to a control with another primary glomerulopathy using demographics, baseline kidney function, comorbidities, and diagnosis year. Covariate balance was confirmed. Outcomes were compared using standardized analytic methods. Results: The matched analysis included 1,236 patients per group. There were no significant differences in acute kidney injury (3.6% vs. 3.3%, p=0.753), new dialysis initiation (1.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.812), CKD stage 4/5 (6.6% vs. 5.7%, p=0.456), or progression to dialysis (1.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.812). MGRS patients had higher rates of pneumonia (17.5% vs. 12.8%, p=0.003), blood transfusion (10.8% vs. 6.6%, p<0.001), neutropenia (9.3% vs. 3.3%, p<0.001), and CRP ≥30 mg/L (mean 4.7 vs. 2.6, p=0.005). No differences were observed in cardiac arrest (1.9% vs. 1.8%, p=0.872), septic shock (0.6% vs. 0.6%, p=0.987), hospitalization (37.1% vs. 33.6%, p=0.098), outpatient visits (mean 4.97 vs. 3.39, p=0.313), or all-cause mortality (5.9% vs. 5.0%, p=0.388). Conclusion: In this large, matched real-world study, MGRS was associated with higher risks of infection, cytopenia, transfusion, and inflammation compared to other glomerulopathies, while rates of renal progression and mortality were similar. These findings support enhanced supportive care strategies in MGRS management.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
TriHealth (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.