Longitudinal Changes in the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Graft Survival in Kidney Transplantation

Background: Socioeconomic status is recognized as a factor influencing graft survival (GS) in kidney transplant (KT). We evaluated the longitudinal impact of socioeconomic status on GS. Methods: Adult KT alone performed from 2003-2013 were evaluated using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The period of post-transplantation was divided into 3 categories; Group1: 1-year survival in all patients, Group2: conditional 5-year survival in 1 year-survivors, Group3: conditional 10-year survival in 5-year survivors. We explored the influence of socioeconomic status on long-term GS in living donor KT (LDKT) and deceased donor KT (DDKT), focusing on two domains: (1) area-level factors, defined by the area deprivation index (ADI); and (2) individual-level factors, including patients’ income, education level. Results: In total, 186,342 adult KT were performed from 2003-2013 (Group1), of which 176,656 recipients survived at 1 year (Group2) and 126,405 recipients survived at 5 years (Group3) post-transplant. In DDKT, the most deprived area (ADI 71-100) was associated with worse GS only in the latest period, compared to the least deprived area (ADI 0-25). In contrast, in LDKT, patients residing in the most deprived areas was linked to poorer GS across all post-transplant periods(Fig.1). Lower education level was associated with worse GS only in the later post-transplant period for both DDKT and LDKT, while employment at the time of transplant was associated with better outcomes throughout (Fig.2). Conclusion: The impact of socioeconomic status on GS changed over time in both DDKT and LDKT. To improve the long-term outcomes, consideration of the education level and areas of residence might be necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2025s5ry8et5
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal Changes in the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Graft Survival in Kidney Transplantation

Shunji Nagai, Pritika Shrivastava, Rikako Oki, Anita Patel et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Longitudinal Changes in the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Graft Survival in Kidney Transplantation

Shunji Nagai, Pritika Shrivastava, Rikako Oki, Anita Patel, Nadeen Khoury, Rohini Prashar
article en

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status is recognized as a factor influencing graft survival (GS) in kidney transplant (KT). We evaluated the longitudinal impact of socioeconomic status on GS. Methods: Adult KT alone performed from 2003-2013 were evaluated using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The period of post-transplantation was divided into 3 categories; Group1: 1-year survival in all patients, Group2: conditional 5-year survival in 1 year-survivors, Group3: conditional 10-year survival in 5-year survivors. We explored the influence of socioeconomic status on long-term GS in living donor KT (LDKT) and deceased donor KT (DDKT), focusing on two domains: (1) area-level factors, defined by the area deprivation index (ADI); and (2) individual-level factors, including patients’ income, education level. Results: In total, 186,342 adult KT were performed from 2003-2013 (Group1), of which 176,656 recipients survived at 1 year (Group2) and 126,405 recipients survived at 5 years (Group3) post-transplant. In DDKT, the most deprived area (ADI 71-100) was associated with worse GS only in the latest period, compared to the least deprived area (ADI 0-25). In contrast, in LDKT, patients residing in the most deprived areas was linked to poorer GS across all post-transplant periods(Fig.1). Lower education level was associated with worse GS only in the later post-transplant period for both DDKT and LDKT, while employment at the time of transplant was associated with better outcomes throughout (Fig.2). Conclusion: The impact of socioeconomic status on GS changed over time in both DDKT and LDKT. To improve the long-term outcomes, consideration of the education level and areas of residence might be necessary.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 36(10S)
Henry Ford Hospital (US), Michigan United (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.